• aeronmelon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    226
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s not what Grandfathered means. Basically, original subscribers are being forced onto a new contract.

    • LilDumpy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ya. I was originally a Google Play music subscriber which got turned into YouTube music, for $9.99usd. Now they’re increasing the cost by like $4 after December. So I moved to the spotify family plan and now I share with my love ones for only a little bit more than the new YT price.

      YT music was turning to sit though. It would always play music video audio with long ass shitty intros when the studio album music existed in their catalog. Even with the music video option turned to off.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, I fell into the same situation. I had a YouTube Music family plan that they told me was no longer grandfathered in, so I also switched to Spotify and have been happy with it. In my case, though, I lucked out because I only needed to keep one other person on the plan with me, so I went with the duo plan instead of the family plan and ended up saving money in the end.

        If Google wants me back they can offer ad-free YouTube for $2/mo and that’ll be back as it was. That’s really the only thing I still miss, because god knows the music player itself wasn’t great.

        • LilDumpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ya. This was my last straw. Figured I’d give them until the end of the original 9.99. So far the transition to Spotify has been good.

      • bitwolf@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        If you were in the beta. It’s 7.99.

        I’ve been paying 7.99 since day one of Google Play Music. They added YouTube Red (Premium) shortly after.

          • RBWells@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            I moved over from Play Music, and if they had a music- only cheaper option that’s what I personally want, but the rest of the family does use YouTube for other stuff, and only the penultimate child is into sailing the seas of content. Per user price is not bad considering how much music we listen to.

            I am honestly less mad about the price and more still mad that they shut down the best music streaming app (best recommend algorithm, the glorious “playing near you” function that was able to find bands I would like but had not heard and only within a few miles of home, the way it would adjust the music for morning, night, weekend, it was so good) and pushed everyone onto the YouTube Music before it was ready. It’s OK now but it’s been years and no way is it as good as Play Music was.

            • LilDumpy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ya. I just want what I had with GPM. After moving to Spotify, was suuuuper surprised to see how it’s changed. Audio books, podcasts, random gifs for album art, bunch of small changes that feels like it clogs up my music listening experience. I don’t even intuitively know how to train the algorithm since I can’t heart or dislike songs. Maybe I’m just a curmudgeon now?

          • Mildmantis@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Right? I’m gunna miss it a lil. YouTube was pretty much the last monthly service I was paying for purely because I was grandfathered in at such a price.

            Oh well. Snip snip

            • LilDumpy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ya I was with the service for so long. I miss that little ugly orange triangle with those yellow headphones.

        • LilDumpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Definitely open to other options, but now I’m basically stuck since I have family on my family plan now.

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Thank you. I was thoroughly confused by this title and the article’s use of “grandfathered”.

      • FriendOfElphaba@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        7 months ago

        Back in the olden days, there used to be a variety of free software called postcard-ware. It was free to distribute and use, but if you wanted to you could send the author a postcard.

        • kautau@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think the reason so many new software projects have authors asking for donations is the barrier to writing software is now incredibly low. In the 90s you’d have to have a pretty nice PC, a good dial up plan, and writing software was much more of a hobby unless you were a pro. Nowadays internet access is ubiquitous, and with the tooling and wealth of resources available anyone can write good open source software. Often those people legitimately could use a donation to help fund their free time work. That and the open source projects that are just used as dependencies for corporate projects are all too common. I absolutely blame the system where people need more money to get by rather than thinking open source software devs are more greedy nowadays

          • FriendOfElphaba@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            I hadn’t really been coming at it from that perspective, but your post got me thinking. I’ve been in the business one way or another since then in multiple capacities - hobbyist, military, government, academia, and commercial.

            Back in the 70s, there was barely a major called “computer science” at most colleges. Most people writing software were largely self-taught, and software companies were a couple of dozen people. Going into the 80s, as the industry expanded, more computers were being sold (mid-sized and mainframes, with a small but growing PC market. Being a programmer would give you a solid middle class career. These were the days when Donald Knuth wrote the cost complete and comprehensive software for laying out text and equations available (TeX, now used via LaTeX) because such a thing wasn’t available and he wanted it to be. He was a professor at Stanford, meaning he had a salary already, so he just released it for free. Those were the days when people argued that software couldn’t be copyrighted because any piece of software is really just a mathematical equation, and you cannot copyright math. Anyway, many of the people writing software had a day job, “programmers” included a large proportion of people who wrote COBOL in tiny chunks for not very much money. There was a large chunk of people whose greatest dream was getting paid to do software for a living, and it was seen kind of people whose dream it was to be a professional librarian. Very few were in it for the money.

            It all took off in the mid-late 90s when the industry got financialized. Fast forward to today, and no one on my team has less than a six figure salary, I make more than most MDs, and my bosses make far more than that. Because of our age demographic, few if any of them have even a bachelor’s degree, much less one in computer science. It was really that 90s transition when it started to be about money.

            But I wouldn’t use the word greedy. The industry just changed, and so did the social relationships. I still have nostalgia for the days when it was more like Wargames and Real Genius than like Black Mirror, but I would never say it’s a result of the folks writing an app that want to do it for a living on their own terms. I think people like Christian Sellig (the author of Reddit client Apollo) represents the best of that earlier mindset, and I sincerely hope he made fuck-you money off of his app before spez shut him down. If anything, it’s people like Spez who are at fault.

            Anyway, that was just a rant, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    People are paying $23 for this???

    Honestly shocked.

    And it’s Google, so you know they are going to keep raising prices, probably adding some ads also in the near future. And of course selling your behavior to advertisers as well, that’s a given.

    • konalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Just curious: Where in the article does it say $23? It says $13.99, so I’m wondering if it was a typo.

      • poppy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        They may be confusing it with the family plan? Which is $23 for up to 5 people, which imo is a pretty good deal if you know 4 other people to go in on it.

          • poppy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ah thanks! Duh. “Add up to 5 members” not just “5 members”. Whoops.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          And it specifically allows sharing outside of a household. So me, both my parents, and my ex all share a subscription. And it covers YouTube Music as well. It was better when it was GPM, but that’s been a while now.

    • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s the family plan. The individual price is $13.99. Absolutely worth it to me. 10/10, would shill again. I watch almost exclusively on Apple TV, so unless I had a DNS ad blocker, I would see ads. And even those will eventually be detected and blocked, I’m sure. This is how much I’ve consumed since signing up in August:

      I love supporting the creators of the excellent science and math content I subscribe to. Plus I watch a ton of stupid Tim & Eric sketches, SNL sketches, kitten videos and such. I couldn’t imagine seeing an ad for every 1:00 video!

      Presented with a choice of paying or seeing ads, imma pay. The price is less than one movie ticket a month.

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I’ll upvote you back up.

        I’m the same way. I use YT on my AppleTV, and I’m an adult with money so $14 isn’t that bad. That’s basically one double quarter pounder meal these days.

        Do I want to see the price increase? Of course not. But I’m not going to lose any sleep over it.

        • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Thankfully, It’s only increasing for people currently paying just $10. They will now be paying the same $14 as us.

          • garretble@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I had the grandfathered in YouTube Red plan from years ago, but I was paying just via the App Store so there was the Apple tax. The price there was going up to $18/m, so I canceled and will renew in about a week (when my normal payment is due) directly from YouTube. I honestly haven’t really thought about the price in a while so I don’t realize it was already $12/m that way (I think), and going this new route the price change is just $1 more for me.

            But I think it’s worth the no hassle with no ads on every device. I go to friends’ houses and they put on YouTube with ads, and I don’t know how they live like animals like that.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      I had no idea how expensive that was. I wonder when prices will max out. $23 is waaaay too much for YT.

    • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Given the quality and quantity of videos on YouTube, it’s probably the best streaming service.

  • curiousaur@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh bullshit. I’ve been on that 7.99 since Google play music all access first launched. They said it was a permanent 7.99 if you signed up that first month it launched. Guess I’m moving services or going back to piracy.

  • littlecolt@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    This is disappointing. I was thinking of subscribing since I heard content creators got paid more per premium view, and $10 didn’t seem like a bad price. But if this is the second price hike in a single year, that definitely gives me pause.

    This is not the second price increase in a year. This was a misunderstanding on my part. I’m still uncertain on the $14 price point.

  • remer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I was grandfathered in at the announcement Google Play Music All Access price of $7.99. They better not raise it. They said during the announcement they would never raise the price for those that signed up then.

    Edit: Class action anyone?

    • grahamja@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I miss Google play, I used to actually buy music that way. I just kind of find MP3s now…

  • Nulubez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    It went from 10 to 20 on me. Considering all I lost (YT red premium content, google play music, etc) I just canceled then enabled a single user free account I get via Google fi. With money saved, bought family a spotify family plan

    • Neato@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      That’s with the $110/mo (for 2) Google FI plan right? And it’s only for a year.

  • dmtalon@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 months ago

    Welcome to the club, I was on the $14.99 Family Premium from YT Red/GPM. I left in a fit to Spotify, but crawled back since I just do not get along with Spotify. It was quite an increase to $22.99, but I literally watch YT as my main source of entertainment, and listen to YT music via Android Auto in my car, as well as through the house all the time. So I am getting a lot of use out of it. but I am not sure I could stomach another increase anytime soon.

    • Weslee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Jesus $23?? No thank you! Spotify and FreeTube is good enough for me 😅

      • dmtalon@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I actually have grayjay on my phone (and paid for it). I don’t mind paying for stuff I use.

        I’ve also used revances, and smarttube tv. But as I said right now the value is still “ok” but reaching it’s limit for sure.

        • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ublock is simply removing adds & more things you might want to be gone and Revanced is literally the YT client with many of the PrEmIuM features for free. But sure, pay up and get milked if you’re into that sort of thing.

          • Sowhatever@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            What about my TV, where I watch most of my content? What about inter-device sync? What about paying the creators for their work?

            I could also shoplift in my local supermarket, but I’m into “that sort of thing” (paying for people’s work).

            • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              How would I know? I don’t have a TV for well over a decade now and it isn’t my responsibility to teach you how to use your hardware and software.

              And please, you’re robbing YT, not the content creators, which I don’t care about nowadays either since YouTube became WhoreTube. It’s all about cash and milking people with low effort clickbait garbage content. If you feel you have to pay for that then that’s on you but I’ve been distancing myself more and more from the platform for how shit it and its content became.

              • Sowhatever@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                7 months ago

                Ah yes, the #worksonmymachine thinking.

                If you watch low effort content you will get low effort content. I watch amazing content that is well worth the few bucks a month. Late night shows, stand up comedy, documentaries, news analysis, tech reviews, car reviews, programming news and tutorials, chess commentary and courses, architecture and interior design tours, sport summaries, popular science…

                BTW, Walmart is a huge company, I assume you also don’t pay there? Apparently robbing corporations and farmers it also would be fine, because “the products are so low quality nowadays” …

                • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Ah yes, the #imtooentitledtodomyownresearchandwork thinking.

                  Followed by a bunch of mumbo jumbo that clearly shows that you also have no idea how their algorithms work. A little hint, they’re nowhere near as smart as you think they are, and neither are you.

                  Walmart left my country for not being able to compete here, so no, I don’t pay there. Not that this false equivalency makes any sense at all because no one is robbed for me not watching a bunch of garbage ads. Maybe stop shoving your head into big corporate assholes.

        • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          One of those is ublock, literally the same experience minus the ads. How is that not close to the same experience? Do you miss the ads?

          • Sowhatever@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            How do I install it on my TV? How do I sync? Do I install on every device I use? What if I don’t have admin rights? What if it’s out of date and the ads play anyway?

            For less than a Starbucks coffee I have a month of premium, and I don’t have to play cat and mouse.

            • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              How expensive are your Starbucks coffees? O.o

              If you want a TV solution, look at iSponsorBlock, not as seamless but much improved. And free.

              You don’t need admin rights, and it auto updates.

              I have premium, but only because I can get it ridiculously cheap by using a VPN. I would never pay current asking price for premium, especially when they increased the price twice in a one year period.

              • Sowhatever@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                A Starbucks coffee is around 5 euros.

                I don’t want to look into anything, much less if it’s less seamless, I’m satisfied with the default YouTube app on my TV.

                You need admin rights to install any software.

                • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  A Starbucks coffee is around 5 euros.

                  And YouTube premium is over double that, potentially triple come January.

                  You need admin rights to install any software.

                  A) This is absolutely not true.

                  B) It’s a browser extension

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s cheaper for me to just bump up my Adguard DNS subscription on my home router. Though I’ve only done limited testing to see how efficient it handles YT ads. (so far seems to work).

    Honestly, the $3 CAD I spend on Adguard DNS through my router has been incredible. I’m flabbergasted when I connect to someone else’s Wi-Fi and see what the Internet looks like outside my door walls.

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Are you speaking about Adguard Home? That’s free, if you’re talking about their premium DNS, there are free alternatives with ad-blocking.

      You can’t block Youtube ads via DNS for quite some years now.

      • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Never found a free one that works as well at blocking ads and trackers.

      • Thermal_shocked@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nextdns was $22/year and worked very well for me for 3 years. I maintain my own now, but for many people it’s perfectly fine to pay for a working service, not everyone wants or needs to fine tune their DNS like some. Just because it’s free doesn’t mean it’s better and vice versa.

        • Unreliable@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          I just meant for ads in general. As for YouTube, Firefox with ublock origin is still working wonders for me.

          • root_beer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Unfortunately, I don’t think there is an ad blocker for, say, Roku, where I do most of my YouTube viewing

            Really wish there was a viable alternative, and not just because of the ads, yt is the last Google thing I still consciously use