Alt text:
Baseballs do present a challenge to this theory, but I’m convinced we just haven’t found the right seasoning.
You must log in or register to comment.
By the logic of this graph the Earth is slightly more tasty than the moon, yet the moon is made of cheese. Explain that, XKCD.
The earth contains bacon.
the earth contains sparse pockets of cheese, such as France. An entire celestial object of cheese would be overwhelming
“Hyperbolic” this, “logarithmic” that, I’m here to propose a radical new theory: all spheres are tasty, your mouth just isn’t big enough to have the right tastebuds for the larger ones
Found Galactus.
Ice bergs. They are kinda round (less so with larger ones) and they are freshwater so entirely edible. According to the graph the object would taste “ok” which is a perfectly adequate description of drinking water.
I bet you could find 800-meter comet made out of ice. I would argue that the water tastes “ok”.
Your mom!
^sorry, ^you ^know ^I ^had ^to
We don’t know if the earth isn’t actually tasty, maybe the sum of all the tasty parts outweighs the taste of molten rock and dirt
There’s got to be an 800m wide jawbreaker
Peppercorns?
Whole and spherical, not particularly tasty. Changing their shape via grinding, however, unlocks fought-wars-over-the-stuff levels of tastiness.
Please explain.
They just have too much taste condensed into a tiny sphere, like mass in a white dwarf star. Grinding them down actually extends their surface area and if you were to toss the ground pepper in the air you’d create a haze of taste that may or may not cause a burning sensation in your eyes and respiratory system
