• Noughmad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, you can call yourself a leftist all you want, but when 90% of your posts is calling Biden and Zelensky Nazis but you never criticize Putin or Trump, I get certain doubts.

    • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Posting about Trump or Putin being bad would be akin to making posts about ISIS being bad: it goes without saying.

      Like 99% of people on this platform already agrees with you, it’s really not a contentious issue. There’s no significant MAGA or Russian nationalist instance federated. None of their supporters would see it, it would be a completely moot point.

      • Noughmad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Oh how I wish that was true. Unfortunately I’ve seen far too many people support Russia in this war, both offline and online, including here.

        Maybe I’m wrong about hexbear, I certainly hope that I am, but on lemmygrad I saw long posts with many upvotes explaining how this war is a good thing and Putin is a hero that is fighting against the capitalists etc.

        Edit: and now lemmygrad had Hunter’s laptop on the front page. Could they be any more obvious?

        Edit2: lol, you almost had me believing that I was wrong and just too paranoid. Then in this very thread I got two people from hexbear telling me how NATO and Ukraine are evil, heavily upvoted. Still nothing bad about either Trump or Putin. Thanks.

        • CloutAtlas [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Right, but if you made a post about how Putin is a great leader or Republicans have better policies and child labour, homophobia and lower taxes on the rich are good on Hexbear you’re going to get shat on in the comments if not outright banned.

          Criticizing NATO is more pressing because online discourse is extremely pro-NATO. Reddit, for example, loves NATO expansion and loved when Finland joined. None of the disdain for NATO is praise for Putin being a corrupt nationalist.

          Also anything involving Hunter Biden is funny. He’s just an obscenely offbeat person. While the Trump children (except Tiffany and for now Barron) are just slimy sycophants trying to gain daddy’s approval while swindling money out of MAGA morons, Hunter is doing cocaine and sleeping with prostitutes. Its never really in our discourse for anti-Biden posts to criticize Hunter, he’s become a micro celebrity in his own right. If anything we literally like Hunter better than Joe

        • autismdragon [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Still nothing bad about either Trump or Putin.

          Its because we don’t have to convince y’all that Trump and Putin are bad because you already think that. We’d just be spitting into an echo chamber, preaching to the choir. There’s no point. To be clear we dunk on Trump all the time. We do not like him.

          Why do you think that leftists have to say “but also btw Trump is also bad” every time we criticize Biden? That would make no sense.

        • infuziSporg [e/em/eir]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          We had a user who would uncritically support Russia and Operation Z. A “Z poster”, if you will. They were banned on several accounts and no one really missed them.

          Some of us tepidly support the CPRF, which is largely controlled opposition. We recognize that counting since 2014, there’s a lot of propaganda, civilian strikes, and land mines coming from both sides. Most of us favor an immediate armistice along the present LOC that follows pretty closely a “dividing line” for the plurality ethnicity as evidenced by the past 30 years of linguistic, electoral, and poling data. And we favor quick peace as opposed to continued hostility that likely will go nowhere.

          It sucks that Ukraine’s self-determination is being jeopardized by Russia. It sucks that Luhansk’s self-determination is being jeopardized by Ukraine. It sucks that there’s a geopolitical standoff between the two strongest military powers that overlays this. It sucks that the only imaginable ruling party in Russia is a reactionary capitalist one that was ushered in by Clinton’s intervention. And it sucks that they’re all probably just going to die in a field to resolve it, and make the situation in Bosnia look like a vacation resort in comparison.

          There is a silver lining in that we are seeing a great power struggle to subjugate its neighbor, and also in that the wearing down of NATO and Russia allows the less belligerent, more progressive, emerging superpower to have more sway in the world. Some might say that makes it “worth it” but I certainly don’t.

          • Noughmad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Most of us favor an immediate armistice along the present LOC

            This is uncritically supporting the Z operation. It rewards the attacker and gives them absolutely no reason to not try again in 10 years (either in the same country or in another one). It’s also what happened in 2014 and you see the results of that now.

            Would you favor an immediate armistice with the Nazis in 1943? I surely hope not, but that would be a quick peace, very much like what the advocate for now.

            • nohaybanda [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’m not sure you know the meaning of the word uncritical but go off.

              Also, just so we’re on the same page, what do you believe happened in 2014 and what has happened since then until Feb 2022? What political and demographic conditions do you believe set the stage for the conflict that has been going on since then?

              Your comparison to WW2 in 1943 is also wildly off. For one, you’ve got it mixed up which side is wearing the Nazi insignia and celebrating Nazi collaborators and enthusiastic participants in the Holocaust. For another, the USSR turned the war around in 1943. It would make no sense to call for armistice when you’re winning. Ukraine is currently stalled and bleeding manpower and materiel. The counteroffensive is all but done, were it not for Western insistence that fighting continues to the last Ukrainian.

              • Noughmad@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                For one, you’ve got it mixed up which side is wearing the Nazi insignia and celebrating Nazi collaborators and enthusiastic participants in the Holocaust.

                I don’t know, which side are Wagner and Rogozin on?

                For another, the USSR turned the war around in 1943. It would make no sense to call for armistice when you’re winning. Ukraine is currently stalled and bleeding manpower and materiel. The counteroffensive is all but done, were it not for Western insistence that fighting continues to the last Ukrainian.

                USSR was just as stalled in early 1943, bleeding manpower and materiel, getting massive war supplies from the USA, and the West was insisting that fighting continues to the last Russian. Sounds familiar?

                • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  I don’t know, which side are Wagner and Rogozin on?

                  Okay but can you actually name institutional promotion of nazism? For example publishing celebrations of Bandera, putting the OUN trident on old soviet monuments, funding neonazi run youth camps, etc?

                  I’m guessing you can’t because while there are certainly Nazi Russians they’ve also tried to suppress any sort of Nazi organizing within Russia. The state is hostile to organized Nazism unlike Ukraine.

                  To be clear, theyre still a right wing neoliberal hellscape, but it is a low bar to clear and one clears it.

      • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        While it should go as without saying I think it’s pretty hard to take it that way when the following statements get made a) The legitimate Ukraine government was overthrown in a NATO croup, b) Ukraine government is a neo-nazi government, c) DPR and LPR are legitimate countries and d) NATO started the war in Ukraine. Every single one of those is a Russian state propagated talking point, all of them made around nuggets of facts (like the leaked chat where some US officials were discussing who should or shouldn’t be in the new government) but ultimately warped into something that can’t definitely be proven true or false. Thus whoever spreads those talking points wants to believe those statements as true, which begs the question of why to believe they’re true.

        • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          a) The legitimate Ukraine government was overthrown in a NATO croup, b) Ukraine government is a neo-nazi government, c) DPR and LPR are legitimate countries and d) NATO started the war in Ukraine. Every single one of those is a Russian state propagated talking point, all of them made around nuggets of facts

          So, theyre all Russian talking points but theyre also all supported by evidence?

          This is a thing that annoys me about liberal conceptions of bias. Everything is biased, the question is how factual things are.

          (like the leaked chat where some US officials were discussing who should or shouldn’t be in the new government)

          Yes, this is what we call discussing who should be in the puppet government. You’ll note that they kept the moderate “we should be nuetral between the US and Russia” organizers out and brought the nazis in.

        • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          I don’t think I could ever make you believe that we came to these conclusions based on an analysis of world history, economics, and the current geopolitical reality and didn’t need any help from Yuri at the FSB.

          You literally don’t understand how we analyze geopolitics.

          “The most revolutionary thing one can do is always to proclaim loudly what is happening.”

          rosa-shining

    • SigloPseudoMundo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You forgot the genocide denial as well. I don’t understand why they worship Russia like the ussr is still around.

    • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Trump isn’t in power, no one is defending Putin, the US set the stage for the invasion and knew exactly how it would play out. Trying to claim they are defending their right to sovereignty, which is bullshit.

  • BigNote@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah, it’s so strange that people confuse you with a Kremlin bot when you repeatedly spew the same fucking bullshit talking points as the bots themselves.

    • Flaps [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Bruh Idk how you got convinced there are so many bots around. Like, sure, if you write off everything that differs from the nato line of thought as bots, then sure, believe what you want. But ti me that’s just absurd. I assume that people I interact with are actual humans, even if their opinions suck ass. But to be so far up your own ass, as to not even acknowledge that people can think other things than you without them being some evil, heinous bot is just fuckin stupid

      • ReakDuck@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Meanwhile, there are literally bots that easily replace humans.

        Its weird that someones life is only dedicated to be negative about one thing. And especially because Russia and China love to manipulate and do everything to convince people that what they are doing is great, its not unlikely they are bots. Especially with LLM its very easy to create a realistic bot.

        Thinking that they are bots is more likely than not because of these facts.

        Well, I guess I shall stop my propaganda and just accept that there are literal communities that are hardcore china or russia fans because of the leftism.

        There are reasons why Elon Musk doesn’t feel alone while having no gf. /j

      • BigNote@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I didn’t get “convinced there are so many bots around,” you absolute idiot. My point was only that if and when idiots like you use talking points that are identical to those coming out of Putin’s Kremlin, people can be forgiven for mistaking you for a bot.

        What part about this do you not understand? How can I dumb it down enough for you?

  • Sleazy_Albanese [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Even im weirded out by how thoroughly the left was suppressed on reddit and other platforms. People on reddit only saw themselves mirrored and thought they were the only ones who existed.

  • xor@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    the strawman is “vote blue no matter who”

    no, it’s vote blue whenever “red” is a literal dictator, who promises to be a dictator when elected, who tried a coup once already, who leads a fascist gop splinter group…
    vote any fucking color against that shit, not no matter who.
    there’s bad, and there’s barely distinguishable from hitler bad…
    stop lying

      • xor@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        i haven’t seen a single “vote blue no matter who” since hillary…
        yet i keep seeing it over and over again on lemmy, as an intentional misrepresentation of people who just want to stop drumpf…
        well, mostly from hexbeer

  • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I forgot how ignorant and self-righteous Reddit liberals were. The ones I’ve seen are easily the loudest and dumbest people on this network of federated instances. They have their “conviction” and “is wrong” sliders completely maxed out.

    • Dinodicchellathicc@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I swear to god I’ll buy sync premium if they give the ability to sort by controversial. This is the stupidest more redditesque thread I’ve run into and i don’t want to miss anymore.

        • AnomalousBit@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Since you can’t see the irony in your initial comment, let me spell it out for you in a way you might be able to understand:

          You drone on about maxed convictions while being wrong. But, you’re literally doing the same thing that you whine pointlessly about: your original comment is nothing but a shitty, baseless generalized opinion about a large group of people, with zero substance.

          But you keep fighting the fight, big dog!

          • marx_mentat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Thank you so much for showing me that not every liberal I meet here will be ignorant and self-righteous. I can no longer say that has been the totality of my experience with them. I now have hope that my next encounter will be just as positive as this one was.

          • muddi [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Is there a base case or do the layers of irony go on to infinity?

            Person: says something

            Another person: this other person has no nuance

            Yet another person: this other person has no nuance, ironically

            Yet another person: this other person has no nuance, ironically

            (ad infinitum)

            Maybe this is just dialectics, although a little snarky

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Bad is the enemy of good, and right-wingers are bad.

    • explodicle@local106.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Do you think pro-Trump Russian bots are building up anarchist/communist post histories to throw you off? Or that anarchists/communists are de facto Trump supporters by not voting blue no matter who?

      • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I don’t go through people’s comment histories to try to validate them.

        And there’s a shocking overlap in vernacular and memes between tankies and alt-right. Obviously they’re diametrically opposed on almost all issues. BUT neither really believe in good faith discussion, it’s mostly trolling and “dunking”. Mix in sarcasm that’s not obvious to an outsider, and the jokes are hard to tell apart from misinformation or “muddying the water”.

        It’s way more present since Hexbear federated in, every first impression is that it’s an alt-right troll farm. After some interaction it gets clear quickly that it isn’t.

        Just expect us normies to have that first impression.

  • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    What’s the difference between a fascist and an “anarchist” who does everything they can to kneecap the only viable left leaning political party in the US?

    There’s no practical difference, just window dressing. They both cheer on oppression and pain for those suffering under Republicans.

    And don’t even get me started on communists. Left and right authoritarians, I’ve gotten death threats from both of them. Whether it’s some leftist telling me I would “get the wall” when the Revolution comes or some fucking Republican telling me that the US was only for Christians and that they’ll go after “traitors” soon, you get to the same fucking place at the end of the day. The only real difference is that there’s far more Republicans, and they’re far more organized than left authoritarians.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      the only viable left leaning political party in the US?

      If you mean the Democrats (which you must to say ““viable””) you are too lost in the sauce.

      “Come on guys, we should back the Strassers. They aren’t perfect but come on!”

    • Rozaŭtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      This comment is giving me so much whiplash.

      I was sure it was gonna be ironic when they started comparing anarchists to fascists, but fun fact: no, they actually mean it. Anarchists are fascists, everyone. You’ve heard it here first!

      I swear, if there’s something liberals hate more than what’s on their right, it’s what’s on their left.

    • Addfwyn@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      the only viable left leaning political party in the US?

      I might be misunderstanding you, so I apologize if that is the case, but if you are referring to the Democrats they are far from left leaning. They aren’t even center leaning.

      You can’t even say they have a better track record than the Republicans. They bomb countries as much (or in recent years even more) than the Republicans. They advocate for wars. They fund ICE even more than the Republicans. They stand up just as much for reproductive rights (read: not at all). They just do all of it while waving a rainbow flag.

      I really hope you meant the Greens or the CPUSA; which have their own issues but are certainly more left than either the Democrats or Republicans.

    • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      bOtH sIdEs

      This is why libs get clowned on so hard. You claim to support “the only viable left leaning political party”, and yet you’re kneecapping large swaths of people on the ground engaging in direct action advancing left leaning values. Remember, segregation wasn’t ended because black people voted, blood was spilt in the streets. Same with the LGBT community, see the stonewall uprising, aka, the first pride parade.

      I don’t care how you vote, but if you can’t see the difference between an anarchist engaging in direct action against an oppressive state and fascists doing hate crimes; well, I’d say it’s time to get off your high horse and do a little introspection.

      • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        yet you’re kneecapping large swaths of people on the ground engaging in direct action advancing left leaning values

        Direct action is meaningless if you’re hostile to building a coalition broad enough to actually gain any significant political power. It doesn’t matter how many lit memes anarchists and communists share on social media and how much they horn on about “direct action,” this is a democracy and without votes going to candidates who can win, it is ultimately meaningless.

        You want me to do some introspection? I did. I remember being young and convinced socialism was the way forward. Then I grew the fuck up and did some introspection.

        • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Direct action is meaningless if you’re hostile to building a coalition broad enough to actually gain any significant political power.

          Spoken like someone who’s never done organizing, participated in protests or any other direct action. You’re a keyboard warrior who’s probably never even interacted with a socialist IRL.

          this is a democracy and without votes going to candidates who can win, it is ultimately meaningless.

          Not a democracy and also I already gave 2 examples showing the contrary.

          I remember being young and convinced socialism was the way forward. Then I grew the fuck up and did some introspection.

          No need to be a condescending dick. I’m also guessing I’m older than you, not that it’s relevant.

          • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’ve participated in dozens of protests. Protests with political organization can lead to change. Protests without political organization are just yelling at a wall.

            No need to be a condescending dick.

            If you don’t want someone to take offense at what you write, don’t smugly tell them to learn introspection. Act like an arrogant dick, get treated like an arrogant dick.

            • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Protests with political organization can lead to change. Protests without political organization are just yelling at a wall.

              Right… I’m not sure why you think I’m not in favor of organized resistance.

              If you don’t want someone to take offense at what you write, don’t smugly tell them to learn introspection. Act like an arrogant dick, get treated like an arrogant dick.

              You were doing a “both sides” between anarchists and fascists, eerily similar to Trump, while claiming to be “left leaning”. I think my response was warranted, if not understated. But frankly, that’s plain ignorant.

              • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                Like I said, attempting to degrade the only left leaning political coalition means someone is hostile to any sort of positive left leaning activism. If that doesn’t describe a given anarchist, then what I said doesn’t apply to them. If it does, then they might as well be a Trumpster.

                • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Who or what is this sole “left leaning political coalition”? If you’re referring to Democrats they are neither left leaning nor a coalition. They are a center-right political party. Coalition implies multiple parties. And the Democratic party isn’t exactly known for activism, unless you’re counting fundraising events.

    • sharedburdens [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      The US has two right wing parties. Never mind nationally, I’ve had Democrat electeds oversee cops “sweeping” encampments just as brutally as any Republican would, what exactly is supposed to be the harm getting reduced here?

      • 31337@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The Republican Party is blatantly fascist now. The next time the Republicans get the house, senate, and presidency, you can guarantee women and trans people will no longer have bodily autonomy nation wide. Children will be kidnapped from their lbgt parents and put into the system. All social safety nets will be gutted. Democracy will be eliminated. If they let public education still exist, it will just be used for job training and indoctrination of fascist ideology. They will shoot immigrants at the border instead of just laying traps. They will expand the mass incarceration program to make room for the dissidents and utilize them for more slave labor in prisons.

        Basically, the U.S. will become Russia.

    • epicspongee [they/them or he/him]@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      What’s the difference between a fascist and an “anarchist” who does everything they can to kneecap the only viable left leaning political party in the US?

      Sorry which party is this? Dems are not even a remotely left-leaning party. Joe Biden literally criminalized the rail workers using their legal right to strike.

      This is also like a children’s picture book-level of understanding of fascism. As if the Dems’ policy of 4 more years of the status quo could prevent fascism at all. That has literally never worked as a way to combat fascism.

      • Cleverdawny@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Joe Biden literally criminalized the rail workers using their legal right to strike.

        And then used his platform and office to force the rail companies to address their concerns. You fucks are so dishonest

        • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          No he fuckin did not, the rank and file wanted 14 days, the rank and file pushed for a strike, which union leadership did not want, the rank and file did not vote to sabotage their striking rights, Biden and the Capitalists wanted 0 days and no strike, the Squad “wanted” 7 days and were willing to sacrifice the right to strike despite knowing perfectly well the 7 days bill would die in the Senate

          4 days is an insulting crumb to incentivize workers from not engaging in unauthorized slowdown measures, sick and tired of you Blue MAGA slugs

    • TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      i dont, im so fucking tired of it already and it isnt even a US election year

      edit: wow what a surprise, out of my inbox, the only two msgs with people bitching at me are the replies in an inherently inflammatory political post. in response to a fairly innocuous comment too! this kind of bullshit is bad for the brain

  • atomicfox@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I love watching the left fight amongst themselves. Maybe they should try focusing on beating the other party.