Citizen X.

  • 279 Posts
  • 32 Comments
Joined 20 days ago
cake
Cake day: January 27th, 2025

help-circle





















  • You are making claims and arguing in a way that prove to me that you don’t have any arguments to defend your opinion, neither articles to read in general.

    I am sure All the billionaires who own pay-walled media companies, thank you for your contributions.

    Thank you for arguing with me for several comments, without having any thing to say.

    Have a nice day.


  • Cat@ponder.catOPtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldWhy hard paywalls is not blocked on Lemmy?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I don’t get your opinion.

    I scroll in my feed for articles that interest me and ignore the others.

    Example:

    I am not interested into both articles, so I would ignore them till I find a interesting thing to read. How much time did it take for me here for 2 articles? 5 seconds max.

    If I found a article that I am interested in, then I read it which would take anywhere between 5-20 mins.

    Following less news sources, won’t benefit me at all.

    Anyway, you seem to be focused on arguing without having any real argument to defend your opinion.



  • Cat@ponder.catOPtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.worldWhy hard paywalls is not blocked on Lemmy?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I did not mean ‘widen’ in that sense—reading and being informed is not about the quantity of news one can swallow in a day, you know—but with the idea of reading different sources.

    I don’t know what are you digging into.

    Also, may I ask how can you be reading three fucking hundred news sources regularly (not daily, obviously) with any sort of attention?

    I read by hour, due to my free time(usually it does fetch 50 articles per hour, much less on holidays and I only read the interesting ones to me.)

    It’s pretty perfect for me.















  • Nope.

    Strangulation during sex carries a variety of risks. These range from effects such as bruising and vomiting to brain injury and death.

    Although rare, strangulation is the leading cause of death in consensual BDSM play.

    There’s no evidence there is any safe way to undertake strangulation. Notably, strangulation can cause injury without leaving any marks and sometimes negative consequences don’t develop until well after the choking episode.

    In a new study, we’ve found part of the reason why strangulation during sex is so common may be because many people mistakenly believe that, while risky, it can be made safe through moderating pressure and appropriate communication.

    But stopping blood flow to the brain can take less pressure than opening a can of soft drink. And research shows strangulation can result in serious harms even when it’s consensual.