![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/8f2046ae-5d2e-495f-b467-f7b14ccb4152.png)
The article states Hamas did not accept the recent ceasefire deal. Didn’t Israel reject it?
The article states Hamas did not accept the recent ceasefire deal. Didn’t Israel reject it?
The theory that all pro Israel voices are paid actors is more grounded in reality than I would like.
Do you believe Biden is more popular than Bernie or a progressive Democrat?
Well… The UK is consistent in trying to cover up foreign governments human rights abuses.
Why do they need these? They have backdoors at the providers. No need for a fake mast they control the real masts.
All of the responders voting to replace him is an achievement
The New York Times has had some past scandals. Notably during the Iraq war. They regained their reputation. Now they are losing it again.
Requiring Netanyahu to let in the trucks on land would have cost no money
If they were going for uncontrolled crashes they would have selected Boeing
Your comment contained an ad-hominem on the comment history of the poster.
The instance you are posting from makes this ironic in relation to the article.
They have targeted media offices directly. There appears to be some level of targeting journalists. You are correct this is not always the case. https://theintercept.com/2024/06/25/israel-gaza-journalism-afp-office-bombing/
"
AFP immediately contacted the Israeli military. The initial response was that there were no strikes on the building. Pressed for more details, the Israeli spokesperson said the army had carried out a strike nearby that “might have caused debris” but that “the building was not targeted in any way.” AFP said the extent of the damage cannot be explained by the military’s response and requested “an in-depth and transparent investigation.”
The four-month investigation revealed that, contrary to Israeli army claims, the AFP office was directly fired at by Israeli tanks. The tanks fired four times between 11:55 a.m. and 12:09 p.m. local time on November 2, from around 3 kilometers away.
Wilkinson ruled out the possibility of an accidental hit. He’s convinced that the soldiers operating the Israeli tanks intended to hit that floor precisely. “The weapon type and accuracy inherent in the Israeli tank weapon system means that the weapon hit the target it was aimed at,” he said. “The question of why remains unanswered.”
A key element in the investigation was a series of flashes of light appearing 4 seconds before every explosion in the live footage. The flashes are shots being fired. A calculation based on an analysis of the flashes and detonations concluded that they were fired from about 3 kilometers away. Further analysis of the speed and features of ammunition led to the conclusion that it was a tank that fired them. Only Israel has tanks in Gaza.
"
The Israeli intimidation and spying on ICC investigators happened outside of the Netherlands. That is what The Guardians investigation managed to reveal.
Instance checks out
They are not soldiers
Hamas runs the government in Gaza.
This encapsulates mostly non-military affairs. Like hospitals, schools and in this case a media outlet. Some journalists get paid by the government which is ran by Hamas.
This is akin to a NPR journalists being classified as a military target because they work for the American government. Or any public hospital staff that gets paid by the government being classified as a valid military target
Everyone in Israel is conscripted in the IDF.
AIPAC solidifies that they own America.
This was a signal to every politician thinking of dissenting from Israel
It is a bit of an elephant in the room.
The real question is how much the Canadians charge for hospital parking