Most of the time technology does not cause a radical change in society except in some cases.

The system eventually adapts to new technology only if that technology can be replicated by anyone, and other problems suddenly appear that the system can’t solve at the same time. It’s just another dark age for humanity, and then it recovers and moves on.

But that is already the fault of the person who gave those instructions to the AI.

Denmark has the best labor laws in the world.

“When you are in a decision that puts you in danger you accept the tool that you initially rejected.”

It seems that Japan has applied this

People want to enjoy the Benicios, but not face the consequences. I think people should have financial education so as not to depend on the government and I understand Denmark’s decision, because if a solution is not applied, they could be ruined by pensions.

Coming soon: Recall comes to Linux

Why doesn’t Mozilla change or add the MIT license to Pocket?

AlphaFold 3 which can help in the prediction of some proteins. Although it has some limitations, it cannot be used in all cases, only in what it can perform without any problem.

I wish there was an alternate history forum or novel that explores this scenario.

Each winter marks the beginning and end of a generation of AI. We are now seeing more progress and as long as there is no technical limit it seems that its progress will not be interrupted.

But the poor performance is due to TypeScript and later this year they will release a Go compiler that will make it 10 times faster.

It could be another Embrace, Extend, and Extinguish strategy from Microsoft, because if the increase in Linux user share leads to an increase in malware, most of those users aren’t experts.

So there will be an increase in antivirus software for Linux, but that will also lead to DRM in Linux, and Linux may become what I swore to destroy. While BSD distributions, Redox OS, and other systems take over to become the new Linux as it was in its beginnings.

It looks like Helion Energy is going to take those employees away.

Rather, it was the ones who requested asylum, but in exchange, they’re going to provide information that will be useful to the Trump administration. For what purpose? I don’t know, but it could be that nothing will happen, or something will.

Why do you say they are more transparent?

In Mexico, politicians are in cahoots with drug trafficking and are corrupt. They often partner with various cartels in exchange for large sums of money. You might think this is unfounded, but it’s not actually true.

But I understand their situation because the DOJ already labels anyone as a criminal, and when they’re doing something right, it ends up being confused with something wrong.

Do you really think most candidates are brave?

I think it’s because of the hatred for AI, even though it’s just another tool. Because calling it a scam ignores the history it’s had since the 1960s.

AI is software that can improve over time; if it can’t do something now, it will be able to do it in the future.

Excessive hatred of AI will also cause people to stop caring about what happened to climate change. The problem persists, but it’s no longer talked about much.

It remains to be seen whether its IPO will have good margins or break records that catapult it into the S&P 500 and Dow Jones.

401k pensions will depend on an AI company and if it goes bankrupt, pensions will be affected.

Do you think OpenAI will break IPO records?