whoever the Army sides with will win in hours.

And what if the army splits in two? That happens in civil wars ya know!

What distribution are you on?

One or more people on the board were upset with Sam pushing Open AI towards a “for profit” business model because they wanted to be all altruistic and not paywall things. But they were completely ignorant of the expensive reality of their tech (look up the tons of articles about Open AI burning through money) and after firing Sam, likely got a rude awakening from people in the company showing them the books. Once they realized their out of business in less than a year if they don’t monetize things, suddenly Sam’s ideas aren’t so bad and they know they just fucked the entire company over.

You done got whooshed 😂

Removed by mod

Yup, this is fascism vs terrorism. My only empathy is for all of the innocent people from both sides caught in the middle.

Between the legs right?

Why are you making me do math?

Why can’t you just say you’re on an 8?

I’ve been using copilot and find it’s suggestions are perfectly cromulent.

Grey beards merge and increment (ie: senior devs unite and rise up)

This is the reason for me. Sometimes I don’t want to step through the code and just want to scan through a giant list of output.

Hollywood hacking or updating packages?

1000000% agree

The speaker of the house is the defacto boss of the parliament and that’s who invited the nazi. Even if they knew the history of everyone who enters the building, the PM couldn’t have prevented the speaker from inviting this guy. Had ANYONE known this guy’s history, this wouldn’t have happened.

The PM isn’t a dictator with total control over who gets to invite people to Parliament

There’s lots of startups making smaller agile AI powered electric robotics for agriculture. Would pair well with a farm like this.

https://itsfoss.com/open-source-alternatives-android/

By your very logic, if they are willing to nuke over nothing, they’ll also do it to countries that sanction them.

Good point, but the number of countries sanctioning India would definitely far exceed the number that would retaliate militarily against them. Non-NATO countries would join in on sanctions but would not join the fight, so there would simply be too many sanction targets to retaliate against.

Just because you wouldn’t help your friends in a fight or if they got attacked doesn’t mean everyone is the same as you and just watch while it happens doing nothing.

I’m Canadian so I’ve been considering this from the viewpoint of the one who got attacked. I’m really having trouble believing my friends (other NATO countries) would put their necks out on the line, and I think they would be more cautious in the face of their own nuclear destruction.

Great response. I think everything you said is essentially the promise that NATO makes, but as I said to another poster, if India is going to nuke Canada because we accused them of assassination, they will definitely nuke anyone that attacks them. Canada has no nukes of our own, so we couldn’t directly retaliate. Now if you’re the leader of another NATO country, are you going to risk getting nuked for the sake of NATO? I just don’t think anyone else would be willing to step up like that when the shit hits the fan. Think about it… are you willing to risk getting your country nuked for NATO? I just don’t know.

I simply disagree. Canada has no nukes of our own so in order to “glass” India, one of the other nuclear powers would have to take that step which then opens them up for retaliation. I just don’t know if I trust the commitment of other NATO countries to commit that hard.

Think about it, if India nuked Canada because we accused them of assassination, they will definitely attempt to nuke anyone else that attempts to punish them for that. Now if you’re a NATO country other than Canada, are you willing to get yourself nuked as well? I just don’t know if anyone else would put themselves in that position.

The reality of the situation is that India would never do something so crazy so it’s pointless to speculate about what the response would be.