“If you don’t stop committing a humanitarian crisis, we’re going to stop sending humanitarian aid!”
…
What?
“If you don’t stop committing a humanitarian crisis, we’re going to stop sending humanitarian aid!”
…
What?
I blame “AI” grifters who are preying on enthusiasm for the next, big “scifi breakthrough” we’re all hanging on the edge of our seats for. AI Pushers came out calling it “AI” when everybody already had a conception of what AI is from media, muddling the point because the layman can’t crack into the “black box” that is machine learning.
This is not targeted at you nor OP.
The answer for both you and OP is tied to your last sentence
so we can all enjoy fried chicken and watermelon on Juneteenth.
Why fried chicken and watermelon and why on Juneteenth? Do you eat fried chicken and watermelon as part of your normal rotation? (Hopefully, ‘yes’ because both are delicious and everyone should be afforded the opportunity to indulge)
The issue is that very evidently in both OP’s case and the one you linked that someone was given the prompts “food for celebration” and “celebration of African Americans”, generated “African American party foods”, and churned out a menu reinforcing racist stereotypes. The inquiry is “hey, where is your head at?”
Because most protests are about making the lives of normal people miserable until they’re pissed enough to hold someone to task.
Are the Tories gonna care that Stonehenge was dusted, from in their mansions? Most of them would love to dig up the stones and use them as new countertops, simply as a bragging point at their parties. But normal people that care about landmarks like these will be pissed and, maybe, bitch to the government.
What do you mean “same combat”, like Amalur made some novel innovation? They’re both just 3D, third-person action combat; it’s a mechanic. This is like knocking Fallout New Vegas because it still had you shooting guns, and we already shot guns in Fallout 3.
The game looks disappointing for plenty of legitimate reasons, so let’s stick to those.
I’m curious how the sentence “There is every reason for people to believe that” gets translated to “sure, you can think that if you want [to be wrong].”
It reads more like, “I can’t say whether it’s ‘1 plus 3’ or ‘2 plus 2’ but everybody is getting 4.” The evidence is all there.
I figured it was an attempt to get votes in before he’s declared ineligible. So when he’s ousted, he’ll say “I got all these votes, count em! I should win but they’re cheating and saying I can’t run! FRAUD!”
But…that’s not specifically about video games?
E3 cultivated an “insider” appeal that not many large cons tried to match. You could look forward to game reveals that you’d mark on your calendars.
PAX has a more indie feel and Gamescom feels much more like an actual trade show.
Yeah, “urban” is an American dog whistle for “black and/or Hispanic”, e.g. “the young man who rang our doorbell was so urban. i don’t feel very safe.”
Yeah, how did they commit this to anywhere that would hurt?
The original comment was talking about the openers for Kevin Hart, not Kevin Hart himself. So the punchline shouldn’t have been made by Hart or about Hart’s son.
I was a child in the 90s: I absolutely played the second without knowing about the first.
“Ah, in media res, how avant-garde…I don’t know who these people are but they sure seem acquainted.”
I find it weird that you think a well-done deepfake porn video of someone vulnerable would be in any way less affecting than if real porn had been released.
Your career can only be ruined if you rely on other people to fund your career. He has enough money (and loans and solvent businesses he hasn’t decided to tank yet) independently to keep going when others would have had to pack up.
You think any other non-billionaire could weather the absolute drain of most advertisers leaving Twitter?
Ew, I can feel myself getting healthier just parsing the word “u******l a***r”. You need to censor more of that.
but sequencing and gene alteration is way cheaper than in[sic] needs to be.
…what? this sounds like you’re advocating for price increases.
Showing our eyes was radical and vulgar – something filthy – back in the 90s. So we all wore shades back then.
Because an adage isn’t necessarily untrue, like the OP is asking.
Then it’ll make meat bots to do all the dreadful stuff and the cycle will begin anew
See, I pictured out he blew out his poop chute