I think it will be okay if you and I stick to our remote accounts for this type of community, but I can create you an account there to act as mod if you prefer.
In any case, it would be nice to have this type of setup (Lemmy instance hosting community and mods on different mbin/lemmy instances) to see what are the real challenges for moderation at scale. I still have on my backlog this idea of working on an unified moderation tool.
If you’d like, I could create the community for you and help you with moderation duties.
That would be a very nice submission to !fediclicks@viewfinder.pro
Migrating the images as in media? The discussion is about database sizes.
The biggest DB I have is the one from alien.top, which got close to deal with 600k mirrored bots and 10M posts + comments. The database was clocking around 25GB.
ActivityPub C2S is not the the solution. It still requires a server and it still keeps the admins in control of everything.
ActivityPods seems to be going in the right direction, though…
How many people like you are using PieFed right now?
360 currently
Please, read things in context. I’m talking about moderators.
Are all the 360 PieFed users also community moderators?
And by doing so, it makes it available only for moderators with accounts on piefed. What is the current TAM? 20 people?
A separate tool could connect to any server federating “Report” activities. What is the current TAM? Any moderator of a group, no matter if their account is on Lemmy/PieFed/PixelFed/Misskey/Mastodon…
“moderation duties” and “regular participants” in a forum system have such different use cases, it makes no sense to try to make it work with the software itself.
It would be better/faster/easier to simply build a separate tool that can be useful for moderators, instead of trying to shoehorn it in the existing API. But I don’t really think that this is something that really bothers people enough, given that last time I asked if I could get 20 people interested to sponsor the development of the moderation tool, and to this day only one person showed up.
If you want it to be “free to most users”, the cost of data storage and IO will completely dominate over the cost of CPU.
There are plenty of good arguments to prefer Rust over python for a distributed application, but “language efficiency” is not one of them.
Anyway, if you are biased in favor of Rust and want a decent argument to justify it, I will let you use ‘It’s easier to compile Rust to WASM and have the application run on the browser, while compiling python in a cross-platform way is a nightmare’, free of charge.
Generally, because I think all server-centric AP software is broken and I want to see a client-first application to browse the social web.
Particularly in relation to piefed: it seems to be focused on the exact opposite (giving more power to the server admins) and it takes a good page of social engineering / “nudge theory” principles to guide its design. Much like Mastodon, it seems to be strongly opinionated about how people should behave and it kinda gives me an icky feeling about its culture.
One more reason to be asking for help from the community and to be doing everything in the open.
He doesn’t need to know everything. No one is expecting him to deliver flawless software. But I’d have place more trust on someone that works in the open than someone who keeps saying “next week!” out of fear of being judged by the initial quality of their software.
I want to support the guy, but damn does he like to overpromise and underdeliver…
We’ve been hearing about Loops being open sourced (which would imply the ability to be federated) for months already. Just publish the thing and let the community help, @dansup@mastodon.social !
Lemmy account age and Github experience are absolute orthogonal data points, how is that even something to be brought as an argument?
If you want to suggest features or improvements, please take a look at the Github repository.
Listen to Bernie:
You were faster than my edit.
What we can do is try go get popular communities to other instances.
I am particularly more interested in getting people aware of Fediverser because of the long tail of niche interests than the “popular” communities, and I am not that interested in arguing over whether a community should be in the largest instance or second or the 8th.
I call your solopreneur community and raise a whole instance.
Seriously, though: can we please stop creating communities on LW? Take a look at Fediverser Network before creating a new community because there is a good chance that the community you are looking for already exists, and even if it seems inactive it’s easier to revive an existing one that bootstrapping from scratch.
The solution is to go to subscribe to Reddit RSS feeds so that we find stuff to repost here.
(Only half-joking)
!blood_donors@healthy.community ready and waiting for your post, so that I can add you as a mod.