For what it’s worth 750 a month is probably less than what a kid costs. Depends on where you live but that seems decidedly low price for a kid

You say that like it’s a defense though.

Yeah they’re paying the people who make the product we sell so little that they don’t even get enough money in a paycheck to have it be worth sending them a paycheck!!

How? Special back door secret deals for one and only one company is the definition of anticompetitive.

Competition is defined as more than one lol

Edit: I’m special, I am first place! But if you knew it was 1st place of one… I sure hope you think me as noncompetitive…🤣 It’s strange to me to think I’m competitive if I have no competitors.

" crypto is mostly something they just hope to resell later to a higher bidder"

Unfortunately this is not true. It was getting used for money laundering, which is not reselling to the highest bidder. The proof is in the fact that they payed the fine.

Otherwise what was the fine for?

Yeah use those "to big to fail’ having banks be integral to the system is a definition to first World. Not sure that’s the dis you hoped it to be. Haha, you don’t have banks too big to be capitalist they have to be socialized…

Zelle (/zɛl/) is a United States–based digital payments network run by a private financial services company owned by the banks Bank of America, Truist, Capital One, JPMorgan Chase, PNC Bank, U.S. Bank, and Wells Fargo.

“existing in your community as solitary confinement.” – Chetzemoka

What a strange take. Isn’t this a contradiction? Anyways I just want to point out that this is… A wrong take. Very strange and very wrong take.

Just know that being social is being human. You seem to forget that at times.

What you call lost is the very definition of human.

Looking for a relationship is not lost it is the most human thing to do.

What is more human than finding another human to procreate with?

Everything else you mention all valuable is secondary to social. The cruelest thing you can do to a human is to put them in solitary confinement.

I will say that unlike the horse and buggymakers or the barrel makers or the candlestick makers who have all lost their jobs I do admit…

None of those are as inherently human as sexuality is.

Capitalism makes a great cell phone. Capitalism is terrible when it takes precedent over humans and people.

Still have stacks of batteries for my V10 and v20. I thought it would be a deal-breaker too but it’s not as bad as I thought. The huge battery they put in the v60s really been lasting. I do admit I prefer to wirelessly charge slowly which possibly helps.

I still have my V10 and v20. My v60 is better though. Definitely some trade-offs but I will argue that v60 is better

You’re joking but 4 phones is not a slippery slope, LoL 👍

There are many problems with Airbnb, but let’s be fair no one’s getting kicked out for having four phones.

It’s a straw man argument to say that this is Not for the places that end up with 25 phones.

This is an attempt to keep party houses under control. I can see how one could argue for and/or against this but let’s be clear what it’s about. 👍😁

For what it’s worth I wouldn’t mind banning cars but keeping guns.

Having guns keeps the working man having power.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_boxes_of_liberty

There are four boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and cartridge. Please use in that order.

The “cartridge” option is more important than almost anything else. Besides jury boxes and ballot boxes.

Some very good points, and well written

https://hobbycents.com/hobby-guides/driving-hobby-guide/

https://www.theintelligentdriver.com/2023/01/12/5-fun-and-interesting-hobbies-for-driving-enthusiasts-to-try-out/

Cars kill in the same numbers are guns, and are a hobby… just saying

How do you do " can make that happen and still get rid of"

Explain please.

Because I have the right to get a manufacturer that is not liable. Much like my ability to get a car is based on the fact that auto manufacturers not liable My ability to get a gun is absolutely reliant upon gun manufacturers not being liable.

You are not participating in a good faith discussion if you don’t acknowledge that making guns manufacturers liable will remove my choice to shoot paper.

You’re proposal will affect me, at least if you’re arguing in good faith.

I use guns to shoot paper. Your argument for what guns are created for is flawed. My gun is not created for the ending of human lives.

My gun was made to end paper from being completely without holes.

Are you saying that my use of the gun is wrong? Or am I allowed to have a gun that is not used for killing?

-Signed a bleeding heart lefty with a gun