He who knows only his own side of the case knows little of that. His reasons may be good, and no one may have been able to refute them. But if he is equally unable to refute the reasons on the opposite side, if he does not so much as know what they are, he has no ground for preferring either opinion… Nor is it enough that he should hear the opinions of adversaries from his own teachers, presented as they state them, and accompanied by what they offer as refutations. He must be able to hear them from persons who actually believe them…he must know them in their most plausible and persuasive form.

  • John Stuart Mill
  • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    In the spirit of this post (understanding the other side’s perspective), could you explain what thoughts you consider disgusting/horrifying and why?

    • Kaboom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      27 days ago

      My main thing is the illegal immigration thing. When the left says they need illegal immigrants to pick crops, what comes to my mind is 1850s American south, with slavery. The south claimed they needed slaves to pick crops, and now it’s being echoed by the modern left wing.

      If farmers paid good wages, they’d get workers. And I’d rather pay extra for ethically grown and harvested crops. I already do to some extent.