• TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 小时前

    As much as I like putting limitations on lootboxes or banning them out right, I’ve seen what developers do when they can’t use lootboxes. $20 to $30 “micro” transactions with predatory menus and game mechanics that make you feel bad for not owning the latest hotness. They will do anything to make that microtransaction money regardless. They’ll just take advantage of a different part of your brain.

    • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 小时前

      Then ban that shit too

      We shouldn’t allow corporations to psychology manipulate children.

      • holo@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        9 小时前

        We shouldn’t allow children online or playing video games. If we’re going full jack Thompson, let’s go full jack Thompson. No one under 21 gets Internet or games.

        • SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 小时前

          Playing games is different than manipulating money out of minors.

          You know that too

            • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 小时前

              You could just sell the game at a flat cost. You know, like they use to and still do. If you want a “Live Service” game, just sell a DLC/Expansion Pack every few months.

              • holo@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                8 小时前

                That would still be taking money from kids. One would assume marketing is involved so that’s tricking kids into making a purchase.

                My solution is simply stop letting kids have video games. If we want to censor things, let’s censor them.

                • Elevator7009@ani.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 小时前

                  Most people consider lootbox/gacha predatory and regular advertising a necessary evil. Regular advertising is often manipulative too, but most people consider lootbox/gacha to be more so, especially because of the addictive gambling mechanics it uses that regular advertising doesn’t. Also, most people are used to advertising, and putting lootboxes/gacha in video games is something I am assuming most Lemmy posters can remember there being a controversy over before microtransactions became The New Normal.

                • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 小时前

                  No. That would be taking money from the parents when they purchase the game. The kids would only be playing the game and so long as there’s no store front in the game, there’s no problem.

                  Would you ban kids from riding bicycles because stores sell them?

                  • holo@lemmy.wtf
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    8 小时前

                    So where, then, are kids getting money for gacha, if parents are buying games in your alternative world?