Building on an anti-spam cybersecurity tactic known as tarpitting, he created Nepenthes, malicious software named after a carnivorous plant that will “eat just about anything that finds its way inside.”

Aaron clearly warns users that Nepenthes is aggressive malware. It’s not to be deployed by site owners uncomfortable with trapping AI crawlers and sending them down an “infinite maze” of static files with no exit links, where they “get stuck” and “thrash around” for months, he tells users. Once trapped, the crawlers can be fed gibberish data, aka Markov babble, which is designed to poison AI models. That’s likely an appealing bonus feature for any site owners who, like Aaron, are fed up with paying for AI scraping and just want to watch AI burn.

  • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 hours ago

    There are different kinds of AI scraper defenses.

    This one is an active strategy. No shit people know that this costs them resources. The point is that they want to punish the owners of bad-behaved scrapers.

    There is also another kind which just blocks anything that tries to follow an invisible link that goes to a resource forbidden by robots.txt

    • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      5 hours ago

      One or two people using this isn’t going to punish anything, or make enough of a difference to poison the AI. That’s the same phrase all these anti-AI projects for sites and images use, and they forget that, like a vaccine. you have to have the majority of sites using your method in order for it to be effective. And the majority of sysadmins are not going to install what’s basically ICE from Cyberpunk on a production server.

      Once again, it’s lofty claims from the anti-AI crowd, and once again it’s much ado about nothing. But I’m sure that won’t stop people from believing that they’re making a difference by costing themselves money out of spite. 😂

      • theparadox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The only AI company that responded to Ars’ request to comment was OpenAI, whose spokesperson confirmed that OpenAI is already working on a way to fight tarpitting.

        Ah yes. It’s extremely common for one of the top companies in an industry to spitefully expend resources fighting the irrelevant efforts of…

        One or two people

        Please, continue to grace us with you unbiased wisdom. Clearly you’ve read the article and aren’t just trying to simp for AI or start flame wars like a petulant child.

        • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well, luckily for them, it’s a pretty simple fix. Congrats on being a part of making them jot down a note to prevent tarpitting when they get around to it. You’ve saved the internet!

          And stop pretending like you’re unbiased either. We both have our preconceived notions, and you’re not more likely to be open to change yours than I am. In fact, given the hysterical hyperventilating anti-AI “activists” get to, we both know you’re not ever going to change your mind on AI, and as such you’ll glom onto any small action you think is gonna stick it to the man, no matter whether that action is going to have any practical effect on the push for AI or not.