chaos3361@lemmy.world to Reddit@lemmy.world · 15 hours agoElon Musk Takes Aim at Redditwww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square110fedilinkarrow-up1157arrow-down16
arrow-up1151arrow-down1external-linkElon Musk Takes Aim at Redditwww.newsweek.comchaos3361@lemmy.world to Reddit@lemmy.world · 15 hours agomessage-square110fedilink
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·8 hours ago Again it is not. Neither of those links suggested that it was illegal to lie Which part of “the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas” caused you trouble? So, are you a USian?
minus-squareslickgoat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·8 hours agoI’m not sure if you are trolling or not, because any plain English reading is obvious Your own quote, as set out below… “the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas” That also applies to incorrect information ideas… or… lies. Or the truth… Or fantasy… Or anything in between… It doesn’t specify truth or otherwise. You are free to assume anything you care to - but it’s not in the actual text. As to your question, I have no clue about your insistence on me being whatever the thing is you keep repeating.
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·6 hours ago “the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas” That also applies to incorrect information ideas… or… lies. Are you a little bit slow? Which part of “information” or “ideas” cover lies? So, are you a USian as misunderstanding of free speach is common there?
minus-squareslickgoat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·18 minutes agoSorry, you crossed the line when you made a ad hominem attack. I don’t get personal in debates, I let the point of view do the heavy lifting. See ya.
minus-squareFelixCress@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-28 minutes ago Sorry, you crossed the line when you made a ad hominem attack. What ad hominem, sweetie? Asking if you are a USian? I explained why. Asking if you are a little bit slow? Your lack of understanding of two simple words certainly points that way.
minus-squareNot Chad McTruth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·edit-25 hours ago As to your question, I have no clue about your insistence on me being whatever the thing is you keep repeating. i think theyre trying to spell asian
minus-squareslickgoat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·12 minutes agoI thought so too at first, but he kept on repeating the typo, so I’m not sure?
Which part of “the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas” caused you trouble?
So, are you a USian?
I’m not sure if you are trolling or not, because any plain English reading is obvious
Your own quote, as set out below…
“the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas”
That also applies to incorrect information ideas… or… lies. Or the truth… Or fantasy… Or anything in between…
It doesn’t specify truth or otherwise. You are free to assume anything you care to - but it’s not in the actual text.
As to your question, I have no clue about your insistence on me being whatever the thing is you keep repeating.
Are you a little bit slow?
Which part of “information” or “ideas” cover lies?
So, are you a USian as misunderstanding of free speach is common there?
Sorry, you crossed the line when you made a ad hominem attack.
I don’t get personal in debates, I let the point of view do the heavy lifting.
See ya.
What ad hominem, sweetie? Asking if you are a USian? I explained why. Asking if you are a little bit slow? Your lack of understanding of two simple words certainly points that way.
i think theyre trying to spell asian
I thought so too at first, but he kept on repeating the typo, so I’m not sure?