Summary

The White House is drafting an executive order to dismantle the Department of Education, aligning with Trump’s long-standing pledge.

However, Congress must approve the agency’s abolition, making its passage unlikely despite GOP control. Critics, including the National Education Association, warn this move would harm students, increase costs, and weaken protections.

GOP lawmakers have repeatedly attempted to eliminate the department since its 1979 founding.

Trump also recently signed an order expanding school choice, reinforcing the Republican agenda of decentralizing education policy.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The executive order’s a symbolic gesture—Congress won’t scrap the Department outright.

    You’re wrong. They will not wait for Congress to do anything.

    Who the fuck is going to stop them, you?

    • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The courts, actually. Been there since Nixon tried similar stunts. Administrative state’s got more staying power than most realize. But hey, doom scrolling’s more fun than reading SCOTUS precedents.

      • Sturgist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        Oh, the SCOTUS that said anything done by a sitting president is automatically legal? That one?

        • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          Ah, you mean the unitary executive theory? That magical interpretation where presidential power is somehow absolute? Fascinating how selective that reading was—worked great for executive orders, not so much for criminal immunity.

          The courts have been remarkably… flexible with precedent lately. But even in this twilight zone version of constitutional law, there’s still that pesky difference between issuing orders and having them actually implemented. The machinery of state has its own peculiar physics.

          Though I suppose when SCOTUS is rewriting administrative law on the fly, precedent becomes more of a suggestion than a rule. Welcome to the constitutional speedrun era.