• whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      I have a bunch in my house. It’s a glorified radio all I use it for is:

      • Set timer for x minute
      • What time is it
      • Ask CBC to play radio one Toronto
      • What is the weather today

      For the convenience I accept the mining they may do.

    • Flic@mstdn.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      @richardisaguy @Tea sometimes they just come free with stuff. We got given two Google ones when my husband bought a Pixel phone. We were going to sell them on but we never got round to it. You can physically turn off the microphone part though (at least it tells you it’s turned off so fingers crossed) so we use the one with a screen as a digital photo frame (and a speaker) and the other one as just a speaker.

      • slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 hour ago

        True, but a mobile phone is basically a world brain, calculator, camera, flashlight, you can watch movies on it in hi def, hate it all you want, it’s one of the most versatile tools on the planet. An echo dot, it just spy garbage and nothing else

      • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Phones are at least easier to justify since everyone kinda needs one now and there aren’t many great private options, especially for the lay person

          • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            46 minutes ago

            I mean yeah, but for a lot of people if they ditch their phone they’ll also lose their job and possibly relationships they value.

            Cell phones spying on people isn’t good, but most people are simply not informed about how invasive they are and couldn’t make an informed decision if they tried. Pair that with the fact that cell phones are essential for a lot of modern life, and it’s not difficult to see why the average person is generally more wary of smart speakers than cell phones.

          • pogmommy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            51 minutes ago

            I meant they’re easier to justify in the sense that I see why people don’t put much thought into putting a spying device in their pocket, not that I agree with the disregard. Most peoples’ friends, family, employers, etc. all expect them to have a cell phone and be available by it. Additionally, the way most people interact with their phones, the spying is much less obvious. They joke about them “always listening”, but a lot of people don’t understand the privacy concerns of pretty typical internet use, so the fact that the device has more than just a microphone, it appears to be worth it to a more typical consumer than us.

            Contrast that with an Alexa, google home, or apple home thing, devices which nobody cares if someone else doesn’t own, which most people only see as a microphone and speaker, and whose primary functionality is to always be listening to you. The skepticism is much easier to arise.

            I’m not saying the level at which cell phones spy on their users is acceptable or even worth it, just that I see why the average user who isn’t conscious of their privacy doesn’t regard them with the same concern they do smart speakers.

      • jim3692@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        At least, on mobile devices, it’s typically easier to install a privacy-focused firmware (like LineageOS or GrapheneOS). Those AI assistants are completely locked down.