The fediverse is small, and thats both a blessing and a curse - one of its several blessings is that in a smaller space we all individually have a bigger impact on what the culture of this space is like.

On this comm (and on lemmy broadly) there’s a lot of discussion about how to grow the fediverse, what to improve, but an easy thing you can do for the fediverse is right in front of us-

  • Be kind

  • Ask people what they think, and why

  • Approach folks you disagree with with curiosity rather than hostility (EDIT: no, this is not specifically referring to Nazis. I get it, they’re the first thing that comes to mind. I’m not telling you to approve of Nazis I’m just saying be kind to your fellow lemmites)

  • Engage sincerely

  • Ask yourself if there’s something nice you can say

  • Make this small space worth being in

A platform lives or dies by what’s available on said platform and often we have this conversation in the context of “content” or posts - and we may never have as much content as reddit does. But content and posts aren’t the only thing this kind of platform offers- it also offers people. It offers community, and human interaction.

Culture and community is lemmy and the fediverse’s biggest differentiator, and we all have a role to play in shaping the culture of this space.

The biggest thing you can do to help the fediverse is make it a place worth being.

  • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Horseshoe theory is horseshit.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is an example of what being nice is for the average Lemmy user

        Jesus Christ you people can’t even comment without going ballistic at each other over the slightest thing

        • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          I wouldn’t call this the “average” Lemmy user, but there is a minority of very loud users who make it seem that way at times.

          If we want this to be a pleasant place, users need to report them, and mods & admins—who, I cannot stress enough, do this labor for free or at most peanuts—need to deal with them.
          https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        You’ve once again shown your empty accusations and insults, contrary to OP’s advice in this post.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      1 day ago

      They have one very important thing in common. They both support the alt-right. Fascists because they want to. Leftist because they’re purists.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        They do not support the alt-right. What are you even talking about? “MAGA communists” almost never show up on Lemmy, and when they do they are quickly shown the door. And Marxist are neither “purists,” “idealists,” nor “utopians,” which you’d know if you’d read any Marxist theory.

        • AwkwardBroccolli@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have read a lot of marxist and anarchist theory. All marxist theories did is to confirm that the anarchists are right.

        • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          They support the alt-right by being overly idealistic and failing to partner with liberals and more moderate leftists to make progress.

          Divide and be conquered.

          • SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Look at what you made me do!

            I wouldn’t have considered genocide, if you weren’t so idealistic!!

            If you had only partnered up with the people who only care about money, we could have returned to the status quo.

            Mate, the goal is to be idealistic. No one is perfect, but we want to strive for what’s the best and hope we reach there some day.

              • SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Sure, harm reduction is good. That’s what’s been happening for the past century.

                But you give the liberals an inch and they’ll take a mile. They’re only “liberals” as long as they’re making money of others, as soon as something goes wrong they’re first in line asking for government handouts. That’s why the liberals will always prefer fascist over left wing idealists, because they’re opportunists more than anything else. They’ll backstab you and vote in fascists if they think they can make more money with them. That’s exactly what’s happening in the US.

                We need new politics where hating on the LGBTQ+, immigrants, women, and putting money over the lives of few isn’t considered a political leaning.

            • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              I disagree. Socialists often tactically partner with liberals on shared goals, despite the risks. Knowing that, when forced to choose, liberals have historically sided with fascists, because fascists will never upend capitalism.

              • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                It makes tactical sense to partner with liberals in some contexts, like a national liberation struggle, and to put aside lesser contradictions to focus on the principal contradiction. It doesn’t make sense to partner with liberals while under capitalism, especially not within the imperial core. The liberals in congress don’t have a shared goal in stopping fascism.

                • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  What, a Zionist genocidaire giving a performative twenty five hour faux filibuster is not stopping fascism?

                  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    lol a few days after he did that speech he voted against blocking $8.8 billion in arms sales to Israel 🤡