Artists have complained about their artwork being stolen, people are arguing about threads.net stealing their data on despite this being a public forum, Reddit, Twitter, Github and other platforms are putting up walls to to stop AI bots from scraping everything.

However generative AI and large language models have been been spitting out their training data including copyright notices and other stuff verbatim. “poem poem poem to get personal data from ChatGPT”.

So, instead of providing all our comments for free to LLMs, how about adding a copyright notice to everything we write?

I propose the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license? Basically, if somebody uses your comment, they have to attribute you, but they may not use it for commercial purposes.

This license requires that reusers give credit to the creator. It allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, for noncommercial purposes only. If others modify or adapt the material, they must license the modified material under identical terms.

All you’d need to do is add this text CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Deed anywhere in your comment or post.

  • onlinepersona@programming.devOPEnglish
    25·
    11 months ago

    CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    Power nor wealth doesn’t come from a single individual, but from a great many.

    Just because you vote, say or do something, doesn’t mean it’ll change much of anything. But if hundreds, thousands, millions, or billions do, then we have change. It’s exactly the same with data. A single data-point is not worth very much.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.worldEnglish
      41·
      11 months ago

      If we all work together, we can make sure that none of us can benefit from the other? How does that even make sense?

      Look. I am unable to understand why this bothers you. I like feeling I have a positive effect on the world. I like knowing, EG, that my taxes help the less fortunate. What you are saying seems completely absurd to me.

      • nicetriangle@kbin.social
        5·
        11 months ago

        Your comment assumes everyone agrees ChatGPT or other LMMs/etc are a net benefit to society.

        I’m on the fence about it myself.

        • General_Effort@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          11 months ago

          There’s no such assumption. The people who use it must feel it benefits them, or they wouldn’t use it. By the same logic, the makers must be getting something out of it, as well.

          If there is some net negative for society that I am not seeing, then I don’t see why I should even be allowed to offer my work for AI training. Normally, harming other people is a big “NO”.

          ETA: You’re not allowed to shoot people with a patented gun, except in special circumstances. Whether or not you have permission of the patent-holder of the gun is immaterial.