• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m expecting to see dual battery EVs in the not too distant future. A Sodium battery for the primary that gets the most charges and discharges which can be easy and cheaper to replace. Beside that a Lithium battery which would only be drawn from after the Sodium battery was exhausted. This way if you’re doing shallow discharges for your “around town” driving then charging at night, and deep discharges for longer road trips where the energy density of Lithium shines.

      • Nomecks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        This is a solved problem. Most EVs won’t let you charge it to the actual 100% level or discharge it to 0.

        • Patch@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Exactly. Really, “fully charged” should just be conceptualised as being at a sensible safe point, with the acknowledgement that it’s possible to “overcharge” the batteries to an even higher level, chemically speaking, but that all sensible devices don’t let you do this.

      • LrdThndr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        So only charge it to 80% and pretend 80% is 100%, like iPhones do. Why is that a concern?

        • woefkardoes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Or you could just use all of the space for a sodium battery and fully charge it as it won’t need long term storage in that state.

    • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m still dreaming of seeing EVs with flexible battery space, which users can fill according to their needs.
      Like a car comes with space for 10x 10 kWh slots.
      If 20 kWh serve your usual needs, the other spaces remain empty.
      And if you plan longer trips and don’t want to recharge each 100 miles, you put in additional batteries. Those batteries don’t need to be owned, but can be rented.
      Ideally there are lots of battery rental stations, where you can get charged batteries and instead of recharging the batteries in the EV, the rent’n’swap stations recharge them.
      During (EV) wise low use times, these stations can provide a buffer to the energy grid.
      …one can dream…

            • that guy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              The good news is there’s only 8 of them, the bad news is they have robot dogs with machine guns on their backs

        • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Then buy it. No need to rent it then.
          The main focus was on flexible energy packs not on the renting, although I’d find it convenient if done right.

          • Forbo@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You have far more faith in capitalists to do the right thing than I. They’ll put this shit behind user hostile DRM the same that Disney does for drink refills.

      • thoughtorgan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Idk about renting, sounds like ass.

        A core charge would make more sense, like swapping propane tanks you get a discount for having the empty core with you.

        • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Wpuld you rather purchase an 80 kWh battery, alrhough you need most of the time only 20 kWh or purchase only 20 kWh and rent/swap some batteries when needed?
          I’m no talking about renting all battery capacity the whole year, just the extra capacity for the 2-4 weeks in the year when long-distance rides are in the mix.

      • unrelatedkeg@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I’ve seen a video with some electric mopeds that had very easily removable batteries. Like you just pop it out and exchange it at a gas-station equivalent.

        It’d be ideal if we could settle on a few sizes - kind of like how we have AA, AAA, C, D, etc. batteries. One can be for such mopeds, one larger for cars and some smaller ones to fill various otherwise empty spaces in a car.

        So if your battery goes bad or just want to change its tech you can do that.

        For normal city driving you carge the car at home. If you go on a trip make a few stops for charging. If you’re really in a rush, you can always pay a premium for swapping your drained battery for a prefilled one at a gas station equivalent.

        To me this seems like the ideal solution for EVs and I wonder what facts make it unrealistic.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’d be ideal if we could settle on a few sizes - kind of like how we have AA, AAA, C, D, etc. batteries. One can be for such mopeds, one larger for cars and some smaller ones to fill various otherwise empty spaces in a car.

          This is precisely where we’re going to get fucked, though, because the modern pathological mindset of every tech company now is to try to build their own proprietary walled fiefdom to try to lock in suckers recurring revenue sources customers and they won’t make their stuff compatible with anyone else’s unless the government forces them to. Maybe if we’re lucky there will be a decade or two of highly public bitching (see also: the Tesla charging connector) until someone eventually capitulates.

        • Bridger@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Different battery chemistries have different charging requirements. So you’d have to have more complex charger/battery interaction requirements. Not insurmountable but another layer of standardization

        • xspurnx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Yup, I’ve been thinking along those lines as well. I can’t believe that every manufacturer is doing their own standards again…

      • filister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        You know, putting and removing batteries would be a very tedious task and I really doubt that many owners will bother with it.

        • fiah@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          also it’s not a trivial task to engineer for swapable EV batteries, doing so comes with a whole host of disadvantages / compromises that don’t make sense for most (I guess) consumers right now. It’s not very different from the phone battery issue, except on a huge scale and with much more severe consequences if things go wrong

          • filister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes, you need to make the puncture proof, they are a fire hazard if stored at home, they degrade over time and if left empty long enough might not even work, etc.

            • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              The enginnering part is for sure one of the reasons we don’t see that idea in the wild (yet?).
              The fire hazard at home and degradation when stored full or empty (speaking of lithion ion based batteries here) go away if you lean on the rental approach.
              Wouldn’t it be nice to save investment and weight by using the required amount of battery capacity while still being able to extend the range of your car easily when needed?

          • LrdThndr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I mean, US Cellular had a free battery swap program for a while. If you were a subscriber and your phone battery was low, you could go into any store and they’d swap you out for a fully charged battery for free. I presume they just ate the cost of damaged or degraded batteries as part of it. I only used it a couple times, but it was kinda nice.

        • zergtoshi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It wouldn’t be necessary very often unless you’d want to take advantage of swapping instead of reloading.