• subtext@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Torrent Freak is not a piracy website. They are a news publication that talks about torrenting and piracy. They describe themselves as follows:

    TorrentFreak is a publication dedicated to bringing the latest news about copyright, privacy, and everything related to filesharing. We are not a news aggregator but focus on unique and fresh stories. TorrentFreak is where news and copyright issues collide.

    For this specific article, they mention that they

    estimated based on sample data from several sources, including I Know.

    The source article in question:

    https://torrentfreak.com/the-last-of-us-is-the-most-pirated-tv-show-of-2023-231225/

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ah, my bad. Could have sworn they were an indexer; but it’s been a while since I’ve used torrents.

      “several sources” is rather… ‘trust us’. Not a fan of that kind of reporting. But I know what you download is something at least.

      That expands the scope to several public indexer sites instead of just one, but it’s still only public peer-to-peer (torrent) traffic being measured. Usenet, direct download, private/pirate streaming, and private peer-to-peer are still left out.

      • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        So, back to the original question: what makes you think that using public torrent trackers are not representative of the bigger picture?

        Yes, obviously not being able to use private stats from private sources narrows the scope, but what makes you think it cannot be extrapolated? Personally, I think that private trackers or usenet would paint the same picture, and niche providers would be too small to make a dent in the stats.

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Because I’m more interested in data than opinion. Maybe they’re the same, maybe they aren’t; without any data to back it up, that’s all it is, opinions.

          When I said the numbers muddy, I’m not saying they’re wrong necessarily; just that they become quite unclear. You can’t be sure they’re accurate because you’re making assumptions to reach them.

          Part of this stems from an opinion of my own however: that public torrents are a shrinking market share of piracy. More and more I see conversations dominated by streams, private torrent trackers, and usenet. That’s not to say they’ve disappeared or ever will, but other means seem more common lately. Though that’s admittedly hard to gauge.

          A small slice can give you an idea of what the bigger picture may be, but the smaller the slice the less chance that idea will be accurate. Take a jigsaw puzzle for example: if I only look at 10% of the pieces I may get enough detail to figure out what the image is supposed to be, or maybe I’ll only get pieces of the empty blue sky… (or is that water… I can’t tell)