• MenKlash@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Taxes exist because public goods are actually good, and benefit everyone.

    Taxes raise money for transfers to special interests and public employees. Why would you trust an oligarchy of politicians (the State) to decide which goods are useful “for a community” and which don’t?

    In contrast to private businesses that supply the goods that consumers voluntarily want to buy, public officials lack of the capacity to pick data as to what people truly demand, much less how to go about meeting those demands economically. They don’t have direct feedback of what every individual in the community want; they don’t pass the test of economic rationality.

    If the Monopoly of Violence can’t act economically, they have no other choice but respond to interest groups, so tax money will necessarily end up with narrow interest groups rather than the provision of “public goods”

    The sum of the parts is greater than the individual parts.

    The end does not justify the means. The mere existence of taxation is detrimental (and antithetical) to the very source of economic growth, that is, voluntary exchange.

    Goods like education and roads, for example, are goods like any other: they can be supplied by markets and markets alone.

    The only privilege we need is a better community.

    A better community will be formed if it’s achieved by voluntary means. Moral obligation is not the same as legal obligation. How can individuals be virtuous? By letting them act freely.

    • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Why would you trust an oligarchy of politicians (the State) to decide which goods are useful “for a community” and which don’t?

      Because we voted for them. We didn’t vote for the board of directors of private companies. There’s plenty of waste and corruption in private enterprise. It’s not voluntary if they lie cheat and steal just like bad politicians.

      • MenKlash@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because we voted for them.

        The fraud of representative democracy. What about those who didn’t vote them (the tyranny of the majority)? We, the common citizens, have really any power if our vote is secret?

        The rights and obligations of a contractual act are generated by explicit consent of both members. This does not happen when we our vote is completely secret, without our names and surnames. Politicians are free to impose their monopolical powers, even if we don’t choose them.

        “Representative democracy is the illusion of universal participation in the use of institutional coercion."

        We didn’t vote for the board of directors of private companies.

        Because we shouldn’t. Except for the lobbyists, they are using their private property and their factors of production achieved by social-cooperation.

        There’s plenty of waste and corruption in private enterprise. It’s not voluntary if they lie cheat and steal just like bad politicians.

        The only difference is that, in a free-market setting, they wouldn’t have any monopolical privileges to mantain their economical power and reputation in the market, as their permanence is dependent of supply and demand.

        • racsol@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Stop being so based.

          1st-world leftists are going to downvote you.