• PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I had to prepare a high level report to a senior manager last week regarding a project my team was working on.

    We had to make 5 professional recommendations off of data we reported.

    We gave the 5 recommendations with lots of evidence and references to why we came to that decision.

    The top question we got was: “What are ChatGPT’s recommendations?”

    Back to the drawing board this week because LLMs are more credible than teams of professionals with years of experience and bachelor-masters level education on the subject matter.

    • rho50@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      It is quite terrifying that people think these unoriginal and inaccurate regurgitators of internet knowledge, with no concept of or heuristic for correctness… are somehow an authority on anything.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Only thing you need to do to realise how bad they are is to play Chess against it. Vs using a chessbot from 30 years ago, it really shows.

    • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, as long as you are the one prompting ChatGPT, you can probably get it to spit out the right recommendations. Works until they fire you because they are convinced AI made you obsolete.

    • rutellthesinful@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      you fool

      “these are chatgpt’s recommendations we just provided research to back them up and verify the ai’s work”

      • snooggums@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        “What do we pay you guys for then? You are all fired and Tummy the intern will do everything with ChatGPT from here on out!”

        • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          You joke but several sections of our HR department got cut and replaced with Enterprise GPT-4. We talk to an internal chatbot now about HR questions and some forms.

          • snooggums@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            That is the least worst implementation!

            I knew one HR person who cared about employees and did her best to help out. She only lasted 6 months.

            • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              It did the opposite lmao. I asked it what my vacation leave was because you need to verify leave amounts before you’re allowed to request any additional leave. It said I had 0 in my balance and I know for a fact I have at least a week left 🤪 took almost a month to sort it out. Had to provide balance screenshots and everything. I’d be probably fucked if I hadn’t manually screenshot my leave amounts beforehand.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Haha and then the conversation would then be “Yes but can we see ChatGPT’s research?”

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s when you drop trou, bend over, spread the cheeks, and ask them to let you know when they’re done reviewing ChatGPT’s “research”.