Hope it is successful.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m not really sure core and thread count is a good metric. The steam deck is getting more specific support and there’s more to consider about a CPU.

    • DdCno1@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Exactly. That’s what nearly all of the competitors fail at. Sure, they might have more performance, are slimmer, have this feature or that advantage, but when it comes to actually getting games to work with them and the user experience, none are as good as Valve’s handheld.

      • Dioxid3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is the reason why I am looking at Steam Deck, despite the competition in raw power.

        • DdCno1@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Avoid the OLED model (due to the danger of burn-in) and get it. It’s a great device for portable gaming, both for games running directly on it and emulation up to and including Switch. It’s fantastic for rediscovering games in your library. Just be aware that the slick user interface gets replaced by bog-standard (and extremely unpleasant to use on the small display) Linux clunkiness the moment you need to tweak anything outside of Steam and games.

          • c10l@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            This is terrible advice. The OLED model is better across the board. The risk of burn-in is also wildly overstated.

            The only reason to get the original model would be price.

            Don’t get me wrong, I have an original and it’s great. I don’t consider the OLED model enough of an upgrade to justify the extra cost but I wouldn’t think twice if I was getting my first.