• Gamma@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I was simply adding information your comment had left out, it wasn’t negating information at all. So congrats on getting the point, not everyone is trying to argue 🎉

    • mateomaui@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      You may want to reconsider your phrasing then if you don’t want it to appear to be argumentative.

      • ConstableJelly@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        Neutral party here, I read it naturally as a supplement to your comment, not an opposition. I don’t detect an argumentative tone personally.

        • mateomaui@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You’re welcome to your opinion but these phrases

          I feel like the opening sentences explained the reasoning behind the article sufficiently,

          They’re not the only ones pointing this out, either.

          are oppositional in tone.

            • mateomaui@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I didn’t ask you. I didn’t ask the other neutral guy either. Not my issue that you have a problem with me suggesting the original respondent check his phrasing to make his intention clear, or pointing out the specific phrases that make it unclear.

              • cygnus@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                “Everybody on this highway is driving in the wrong lane! What a bunch of idiots!”