• LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            When people say “anti-woke”, they actually mean that they are anti-doing anything about the awareness of systemic inequality that wokeness indicates. By definition, someone who is against change/progress is a conservative, so when someone says they are anti-woke, they are by definition expressing a conservative stance. That is, wanting to do something about systemic inequality is synonymous with having a progressive stance on systemic inequality.

            Being a tankie, on the other hand, is not synonymous with being a comunist. Tankies are just one form of communist (militant).

            • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              And when people say they are “anti-tankie”, they actually mean that they are anti doing anything about the awareness of systematic inequality that tankie indicates. By definition, someone who is against change/progress is a conservative, so when someone says they are anti-tankie, they are by definition expressing a conservative stance. That is, wanting to do something about systemic inequality is synonymous with having a progressive stance on systemic inequality.

              Being a tankie, on the other hand, is not synonymous with being a comunist. Tankies are just one form of communist (militant).

              Other way around: communists are just one form of tankies, the word is also used to refer to anarchists and some soc-dems.

              • LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re spun around, flipped upside-down, and confused as can be.

                Tankie is a term that specifically refers to one particular kind of communism; namely, the kind that supports authoritarian regimes that try to impose communism through the use of force to repress dissent.

                You can be a communist and not be a tankie. You cannot be against progress and be a progressive.

                • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  You’re spun around, flipped upside-down, and confused as can be.

                  Very compelling, but have you considered

                  spoiler

                  PIGPOOPBALLS

                  Tankie is a term that specifically refers to one particular kind of communism

                  No, it’s used to refer a wide, vague blob of vibes, just like the word woke. The people who use it can can do use it to refer to all kinds of communists, most anarchists, and anything to the left of Elizabeth Warren in general.

                  that try to impose communism through the use of force.

                  As opposed to the kind of communism where you ask nicely for revolution? Have you actually read any Marx? I guarantee he was not a pacifist.

                  You can be a communist and not be a tankie

                  By your own definition you cannot, let alone by a definition of tankie that describes how libs actually use it.

                  • LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    As opposed to the kind of communism where you ask nicely for revolution? Have you actually read any Marx? I guarantee he was not a pacifist.

                    You deliberately misquoted me by cutting off the end of that sentence so you could have a nice soft strawman to swing at. The full sentence said

                    that try to impose communism through the use of force to repress dissent.

                    Forceful revolution by the workers against the capitalist class is a completely different matter from forceful repression of dissent by the state against students and professors.

                • AcidSmiley [she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Tankie is a term that specifically refers to one particular kind of communism

                  Nope, tankie originally referred specifically to British labor party members supporting the USSR’s actions against the coup in Hungary, and today is used to refer to any anti-imperialist leftist, regardless of tendency. Of course all of you claim otherwise, but these claims are provably empty, as nobody who uses the term today, including you in this thread, bothers to check for the actual political views of the people you call tankie, you see something that may go against the state department narratives that are spoonfed to you by V*ush and the reddit front page or whoever else has done this pseudo-leftist brainworming to you and you start yelling tankie at the top of your liberal, western-chauvinist lungs. A good number of the people posting on hexbear are anarchists and DemSocs, but you will label all of them tankie as long as they critically support China or question the narrative on the new forever war in Ukraine, which to you equals “thinking today’s Russia is true communism” and similar nonsense. Your understanding of politics is damaged beyond repair by being socialized as a smartass debatelord who has become entirely incapable of forming judgements not based on learned reflex and of engaging in good faith conversations. I would pity you if people like you wouldn’t be such a disaster for the Western left and for anybody in the Global South suffering from the continued imperialism you help enable by fighting the last genuine critics of genocidal US policies that are left in the West. You CIA tool, you psyop casualty, you neocon bootlicker.

                  • LittleLordLimerick@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t call someone a tankie based on where they post, but in what they post. If you don’t want to be called a tankie, then don’t post tankie shit.

          • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Tankie usually refers to Marxism-Leninism (as well the ideologies that derived from it such as Maoism). But there are communist ideologies that don’t derive from ML such as Orthodox Marxism, trotskyism, libertarian Marxism, bulshevism, etc.

            • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Tankie usually refers to Marxism-Leninism

              no it usually refers to whatever the fuck the person posting it seems to think it is, there is not a coherent label for it.

              Orthodox Marxism, trotskyism, libertarian Marxism, bulshevism, etc.

              Oh cool, which societies use those?

              • Dr. Jenkem@lemmy.blugatch.tube
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                no it usually refers to whatever the fuck the person posting it seems to think it is, there is not a coherent label for it.

                Why are you letting libs define everything? You and I both know they’re dumbasses and shouldn’t be taken seriously.

                Oh cool, which societies use those?

                Anyone could have said the same to Marx about communism at any point in his life, as he died before the October revolution.

                • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Anyone could have said the same to Marx about communism at any point in his life, as he died before the October revolution.

                  the difference is you named a bunch of dead ideologies that will never be revived, ML is literally the only form of marxism still flourishing

        • JamesConeZone [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          How do you differentiate yourself from them as a socialist? What is your theory of power and how it relates to authority, revolutions, and the working class that causes you to make this separation between supporting non-western communist countries and not?

          • Alterecho@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m sorry, maybe I’m misunderstanding here. I think the delineation between authoritarian regimes and non-authoritarian governments is pretty clear - are you implying that all socialist and communist influenced governments are necessarily authoritarian?

            • JamesConeZone [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              No, I’m suggesting that authoritarian is a meaningless term unless defined specifically and was asking what theories of power and authority they had for making the delineation they are.

              The derogatory term authoritarian is always leveled at socialist or communist countries, and never capitalist ones even though capitalist countries restrict rights for the majority of their populations by the very nature of the inherent power structure in capitalism. Even though communist countries usually enjoy far more decentralised authority, better voting rights, and higher political involvement in the populace, they are labeled as “authoritarian,” the implication being that they need “freedom” aka capitalism

              • PvtGetSum@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                What? The term authoritarian is thrown at non-communist/capitalist nations all the time. Syria, Nazi Germany, Libya, Franco’s Spain, Modern Russia, and a million other instances. Authoritarian is a clearly defined term and is in no way exclusively applied to communist nations in almost any circles. It also happens to have been applied to most “communist” countries because most of them have been authoritarian

                • JamesConeZone [they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Notice you didn’t name the United States which is just as authoritarian as modern Russia by any definition we choose (voting rights? participation in political process? allowed dissent? access to clean water? basic access to healthcare? food desserts? policies meant to keep people in poverty?). That’s my point. It’s an ethereal term unless properly defined.

                  We’ll have to set Libya aside since after given “freedom,” there are now literal slave traders everywhere.

                  • PvtGetSum@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I don’t particularly care as that wasn’t my point. My point was to disagree with your comment prior which stated that authoritarian as a term was mainly used as a truncheon against communist nations in order to increase support for capitalism, which it isn’t.