TL;DR: Americans now need to make $120K a year to afford a typical middle-class life and qualify to purchase a home. Minimum.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I honestly don’t even know why this upsets me so much. I am 50 and all set. I don’t have children and barely any debt. I never considered myself particularly patriotic but somehow this whole thing gets under my skin. I guess it sours my achievements and fruits of decades of struggle (it took three generations of planning and hustle to get us out of poverty). It’s like being a kid having a birthday party at Chuck E Cheese by yourself while all your friends are locked outside and you can see them through the glass windows.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Capitalism did that too. Capitalism is in a constant state of decline with short upward bursts of innovation that too will decline. Enshittification infects all.

  • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you want the results of the American dream the only way to do so is crime. Probably always been true, but boy is it truer than ever now.

      • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, back in my day. A simple theft only got you a few days in jail. With inflation, we’re looking months now for the same crime.

        Shakes head

        • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          transportation costs, suppliers, loss prevention is not 100%, insurances, food, lower customer base due to inflation/ cheaper lower quality alternatives (goes hand in hand), office supplies/ services, etcetera

          inflation has hit everyone even in the shady areas

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Where we failed is that $120k was supposed to be a middle-class income when living costs this much. The fact the median is 63k is a sign that all the excess value has been sucked out of the masses and funneled into the coffers of the billionaire class.

      • Ech@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s both. If the price of homes aren’t reflecting an affordable price, you have to ask, who’s buying them? It’s not the average family - it’s corps sucking up homes as investment assets, driving up prices to sell to each other and the “lucky” family or two that get to empty out their retirement fund just to have a place to live. That’s not reflective of a natural, reasonable increase. That’s the result of hedge funds destroying the housing market for the rest of us, just to pad their bank accounts.

        • yacht_boy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That may be true in some of the lower priced Midwestern markets, but I sell real estate in Boston and I don’t see big corporate interests in the single family or owner occupied 2-3 family market. as much as big corporations have ruined a lot of things in this country, I don’t think we Dan just wave our hands and say “corporate buyers” and explain away our housing market problems.

          We have a confluence of decades of exclusionary zoning and restrictions on building that make meaningfully adding to the supply of housing almost impossible. We have a huge deficit of qualified workers in the building trades, in part because all the work dried up after the great recession and people left the field and in part because we’ve pushed more and more kids to go to college. We have a mortgage system that’s nearly unique worldwide that allows homeowners tremendous advantages in keeping their housing costs low, but inversely provides tremendous disadvantages to having them move around more often and free up housing stock (so lots of aging singles and couples in big houses better suited for young people with kids). We have a society that’s bizarrely fixated on single family living even though we desperately need more density in most markets. And we have the problem of wage stagnation. None of those things are directly attributable to corporate ownership of large numbers of houses.

          I’d love for there to be some silver bullet where we could just say “disincentivize corporations from owning small housing stock” and solve the problem, but it’s nowhere near that simple.