• Lad@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    The tankies that they keep complaining about are just your traditional Marxist-Leninists saying Marxist-Leninist things.

    I think some Lemmy users like the image of being communist without actually subscribing to orthodox communist viewpoints. Just accept that you’re not one, there’s no shame in it.

    • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I agree, you should see how mad the liberals got when I told them that the term leftist means someone who is against capitalism, not just people more left than elected representatives. Had a whole fight with me about the word not meaning that and that you could totally be a capitalist supporter and a leftist.

      • Liz@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        It really depends who you’re talking to. That’s the big problem with political buzz words. If Jordan Peterson called me a leftist it basically means that I don’t think dominating others is good. If someone on lemmy.ml called me a leftist, they’re probably assuming I agree with a bunch of theory I’ve never even heard of.

        • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Words have meaning and we dont let people arguing in bad faith determine that meaning. Most republicans would call Biden socialist, but is he by any measure?

          • SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            2 months ago

            I agree. Thanks to conservatism worldwide, leftist has become not a set definition but a term denoting relative ideological standing. Anything other than far-right is proclaimed as “extremist Communist socialism”, which is on its face hilarious but also letting idiots dictate the manner in which we communicate.

            We really have to wrench these terms back and I believe holding fast to and explaining their actual definitions is the foundation of accomplishing this.

            • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Full agreement, if we describe positions as vibe-based and not based on what they attempt to accomplish and how, nothing can be reasonably discussed without first defining terms.

          • Liz@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure, but the point is that you don’t know how your audience is going to interpret the word leftist when you use it on the internet. Better to use words that have clear meaning or to clarify what you mean when using words that have multiple understandings.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nah. There are cases where it stops being about upholding their values and more cheering on one side over another even if what they support is against their values.

    • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They craft an image of Marx in their heads because they agree that Capitalism has issues, otherwise they would be on Reddit, but never actually read Marx. That’s the crux of these liberals complaining about Marxists and Anarchists.

      Lemmy.world is allergic to reading theory, basically

      • cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        In a lot of cases, while I am frustrated by them, I don’t entirely fault them.

        Theory is dense and written in an antiquated way since the base of it is over 200 years old. Folks often try to find a summary, which can lead to a whole slew of rightwing disinfo. On top of that, anarchism has been actively maligned in the US since the dismantling of unions in the 1920s and communism has been since the cold war, so people often have to overcome their initial misconceptions before they can even begin to learn.

        • Cowbee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          You’re absolutely correct. It’s why I have a Lemmy.ml account in the first place, I want to reach out and feed them theory, or challenge their pre-existing worldviews in a manner that might lead to good discussion. It doesn’t work most of the time, but it has worked in other instances, and that makes it more worth it to me.

          That, or I’m a masochist, lol