• themurphy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        5 months ago

        No, but that doesn’t make it good.

        The whole world except a minority moved away from SMS a long time ago.

        • GingeyBook@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s great that the rest of the world moved on. That doesn’t mean that those of us in locations that haven’t moved on have to use the most inferior version of messaging.

          • themurphy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I didn’t say that, but it might explain why Apple didn’t say much. I’m just keeping the discussion to the thread.

          • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            The only people who didn’t move on are Americans.

            Nobody else uses SMS for anything else than service messages. Nobody cares about “bubble Color” in Europe, Asia or Africa

        • bobo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          They’ve moved on to specific platforms, not open standards. Ultimately, that’s not a good thing. Like when Twitter effectively replaced RSS for a lot of use cases.

          • themurphy@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Might be a 10thDentist take, but I could be surprised.

            It’s reliable in specific use cases, I’ll give it that.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              5 months ago

              Great point. I’m sure they’re decrypting my rcs messages somehow and selling that data. And I’m sure your response here has nothing to do with riding apple wang

              • iarigby@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                there were other comments here mentioning that rcs has issues with encryption, and I don’t think handing over our private communication to isps is a step forward. It is literally a decade long step back.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  You’ll still have Instagram! Don’t think of it as handing over your private communication to your phone carrier, think of it as “also having that choice”. It ps a step forward to have more choices.

                  I’m somewhat hopeful, since mobile carriers are somewhat regulated. They can be forced to care. Meanwhile, something like Instagram is a private company with noe oversight, who can choose to do almost anything they think will bring in more money

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  I trust my data with my ISP farrrrrr more than I do meta, and also I’m very unconvinced my ISP has access to anything at all here.

    • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      This makes no sense. Apple is bad, and also I want encrypted messaging. It’s called Signal. It’s free for iOS and Android both.

      • Delusion6903@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        I love Signal and use it with my family which is the majority of my messaging. But I was surprised to find out the rest of my family on iPhone are missing features I have on Android. This doesn’t help bring the iPhone users.

    • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      5 months ago

      Except RCS isn’t awful at all. It’s also end to end encrypted on androids. If Apple’s participation isn’t encrypted, that’s on Apple.

      • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        58
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Only Google’s proprietary extension has encryption. The actual industry standard specification of RCS has no encryption defined at all.

        Edit: It turns out Apple have refused to use Google’s proprietary encryption implementation and are instead working with GSMA to update the RCS Universal Profile specification to finally have encryption defined and standardised so that any RCS client can handle encrypted payloads (whereas only Google Messages today can do encrypted RCS and requires other users to be exclusively using Google Messages otherwise messages are sent unencrypted).

      • devfuuu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Doesn’t rcs depend on having mobile data or internet access on? If I understand it right it is strictly worse than sms.

        Many people just have data off most of the time and sending messages with the system app assumes things are delivered immediately and everyone easily receives them. If you forget your data is off or don’t have internet for a while then you end up assuming people received stuff when they didn’t.

        All phone isps have basically unlimited sms for free when data is paid in huge amounts of gold.

        Sms > Rcs

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          It’s not worse than SMS in any fashion. Just like SMS, RCS will tell you when your text is actually delivered. You will never assume somebody received something that they didn’t. Furthermore RCS offers read receipt functionality which will additionally let you know your message was read. SMS is not capable of that.

          RCS also lets you actually send media to your contacts, like photos and videos without horribly mangling them with compression.

          And as for having no data connection, your phone will fall back to SMS same as iMessages do. Which shouldn’t be at all necessary as most people have unlimited data plans and even when throttled RCS has such a small footprint you shouldn’t have any trouble.

          • devfuuu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            Most people definitely DONT have unlimited data plans. In fact they are so limited and expensive that many just have the data turned off and rely on public wifi connections everywhere they go to use internet.

            Nobody needs to bother with sms delivery because it just works. The only time it doesn’t is if someone has their phones turned off.

            Sending media is just a nice to have, not necessary.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Nope, most people do have unlimited data plans. And unless you live in some tiny, mountainous, Eastern European backwater, the plans aren’t actually that expensive either. And even if you truly are a time traveler from the year 2002 like you appear to be, and you have an incredibly limited 5GB data plan, you’ll be happy to know that even if you reach your data cap, you will still have data connectivity enough to use RCS without issue. All that happens when you “run out” of data on phone plans is you’re throttled down to a slower speed that is still more than sufficient to sent text messages over RCS.

              • kalleboo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                My experience is that the tiny, mountainous, Eastern European backwaters are the places with the cheapest plans, and places like Germany and Canada have the worst ones.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      5 months ago

      Apple being shit has been proven time and again. This is just the latest edition