• LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    it was a little inaccurate

    It wasn’t, though. There was nothing I said that needed amending, nor nothing they said that effectively amended. And they weren’t called upon to do so. They could have said the same exact thing without coming off like a prick.

    • irmoz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was, because like I said, it is ideological. You said it wasn’t. After I’ve explained my point, you can’t just say “nuh uh”.

      • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        What?? You need to go back and re-read who said what. I said it is ideological. It’s the other guy who said that it’s not.

        Are … you replying to the wrong user? Oh gods, do you think I"m … him? 🤮

          • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s okay. In retrospect, I wasn’t called on to be so aggressive in my response to him. I should have just immediately blocked and moved on, but I let it get under my skin.