Pull request #10974 introduces the @bitwarden/sdk-internal dependency which is needed to build the desktop client. The dependency contains a licence statement which contains the following clause:

You may not use this SDK to develop applications for use with software other than Bitwarden (including non-compatible implementations of Bitwarden) or to develop another SDK.

This violates freedom 0.

It is not possible to build desktop-v2024.10.0 (or, likely, current master) without removing this dependency.

  • Danitos@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    26 days ago

    @bitwarden bitwarden locked and limited conversation to collaborators

    They also locked the thread 16 hours ago (as of writing this comment), with no explanation.

    • asap@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      The explanation is the second-to-last comment before it got locked. 🤦

      This hysteria is really stupid.

        • asap@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          26 days ago

          That may or may not be the case, but the comment I replied to said they locked the thread with “no explanation”.

          • cmhe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            26 days ago

            I would say a proper explanation includes the goal you want to achieve, not just the statement that you think that you are allowed to do something.

      • Danitos@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        That’s the technical explanation for the changes, no an explanation for closing the discussion all together.