• stratoscaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Why does that even matter? Currently, if you have a locked phone and switch carriers, you have to buy an entirely new phone anyways.

    At least this way, a user can pay once, and then hop around carriers depending on what’s cheap.

    Also there’s no shot that locking users to phones costs that much because the unlocked version of a phone is only like 15-20% more expensive. Since when did you ever get a 70% discount on the MSRP of a phone for buying it locked??? They’re straight ass lying lmao

    • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      That’s the problem. You have to buy a brand new phone because your phone is locked. With this law if you bought your phone outright you could switch carriers within 2 months if you found a better deal and still keep your phone. Can’t currently do that in the US.

      And the whole locking cost is made up. It’s simple to make a phone “unlocked”. The cost in inflated on purpose to create a need so they can offer locked at a discount.