It’s important to remember that what was before is not now.
Saying it’s all the same is disrespectful to what was taken
Meh, ask it whatever, require it cite it’s source, then go follow up and verify for yourself
Essentially the joke everyone made about nfts.
Nissan leafs and toyota Prius have been around in big numbers for more than a decade.
It’s the enshitiffication that all modern cars are doing: cramming way too much tech into something that is for moving people around, not entertaining them
I make no expectations.
Itt: people praising Russian “diplomacy” .
This is like Russia is currently mugging Ukraine, and if Ukraine just stops resisting and let’s them finish, they won’t kill them after.
“If you’d stop defending yourself, all this violence would end!”
They probably mean of Linux flavored ps coverage.
(I’m aware Mac is very different than Linux, but it is more closely grouped with Linux than Windows)
Lol
“Do not use an incredibly concrete example”
“who are ready to churn out the same characters for another generation”
Edit downvotes from mickey, I mean mario
Dude was deprived of his freedom, put in a life threatening position, etc.
Those are serious things
Well, disagree but that’s fine
I think proving the actual content is present in the song is more challenging, then it gets into the murk of “inspired by/influenced by” etc
In the end, these groups probably did edit literally include the songs in the training set, and are in violation.
Agree. I believe I acknowledged that in my last sentence.
My point is a frivolous claim is a thing , and someone bringing a claim must suffice a basic level of evidence to even proceed. Indeed, as you say, “judgement” is at a lower final standard in a civil suit.
If, as one of the quotes stated, they are worried about being “on a precipice”, maybe worry about the fact that you are doing tons of construction for games facilities, and athletes and staff are flying in from all over the world.
That massively dwarfs the ac the athletes want, I’m sure by several orders of magnitude.
Edit and here you are, casually excluding the admittedly and respectfully ignorant, while they try to become better informed.
Is this how you think you bring people to your position? Or educate them?
Edit this is a global discussion platform. Someone is allowed to say “I don’t know what that is”. You don’t have to hold their hand, you could for example say “those are political factions in Taiwan,” and that’s that, but criticizing someone for saying they don’t understand is gatekeeping, shitty behavior. Assuming their political alignment (and then denigrating them for that assumed alignment), all based on their seemingly good natured request for clarification is additionally shitty.
Edit edit it is also a journalistic and academic standard to write out acronyms the first time they are used, this isn’t an opinion thing, a political alignment thing or any else.
Well I’m not defending this, but that isn’t how crimes are prosecuted, thankfully. Prosecution is obligated to prove their case with evidence.
Like, they have to prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that you were at the crime scene and committed the act.
Edit Indeed of someone DOES have some sort of evidence you committed the crime and you offer no rebuttal, then you’re hosed
Some people can only pay the minimum, and in certain loans that gets you no closer to paying it off.
This type of principle based trap is a very common issue
This comment displays a privileged, ignorant position
I believe the US isn’t creating more of these, and they are used in Ukraine because it’s their choice to deploy these munitions on their land
Cold sweats are chill