You mean like how they’re murdering women by preventing life saving health care?
At least this dude said something. These women were killed for simply being a woman.
The action is already started.
You mean like how they’re murdering women by preventing life saving health care?
At least this dude said something. These women were killed for simply being a woman.
The action is already started.
I loved those movies but they went way to hard into that suit in the later movies. I got ridiculous lol.
Tom Mueller the person who was at SpaceX at the start would wholly disagree with you and says so online, as have other people, but instead people just say they are saving face and rely on anonymous sources to say he does jack all.
So like I said, ignorance.
It’s blissful sure, but it’s ignorance.
Edit: there are plenty of reasons to hate and dunk on the dude, but people love to enhance it with stuff like he doesn’t and never did do anything to make their hate seem even more worthy. All it does though is make you look ignorant.
On the social media front Elon literally knows nothing, but it’s impossible to deny that he hasn’t helped build 2 companies that know how to manufacturer complex hardware at scale. To deny that just shows ignorance.
So while Intel has so many problems, and there’s the whole politics disaster side of things, he might not actually cause the end of Intel from a hardware perspective.
Ya, it’s definitely shouldn’t be a source. I think it would be great if all sites had something like this though. Retractions on reputable news sites also go by unnoticed.
Imagine going to the BBC website and it showing you that with 2-3 articles on rare occasion.
Good Morning X User.
Before you can continue using the site, we must inform you of these 126 posts you saw that were misinformation or outright lies.
Please consume each post for 30 seconds and then you may continue.
Prev/next
We’re years in at this point.
Unidentified Drone - identify yourself or we will shoot you down with feathers!
/operator/ feathers? Dammit, is there even a drone there or is that also a hallucination.
Automated #4 Turkey Turrets with AI tracking.
We might get a video of the white house’s defence systems shooting it down instead.
Microsoft’s
I would have sworn you wrote McDonalds the first time, and I was like wtf went on there that I had no idea about, until you got to the 2nd Microsoft.
Elections?
"Christians, get out and vote, just this time. “You won’t have to do it anymore. Four more years, you know what, it will be fixed, it will be fine, you won’t have to vote anymore, my beautiful Christians.”
I think what they meant is even if he finds something that works, the data can’t be trusted, which will heavily delay things like doing it properly.
I knew (but forgot) they thought the 1st one was likely and didn’t disclose it, was it others as well?
The shareholders chose to do it, it’s their company, they can do whatever they want with it (as long as they weren’t misled as the judge has ruled they were).
Trying to control what the shareholders do with their company like that is not the way to solve a problem. And if you don’t own any voting shares, then you have no reason to complain about what they decide to do.
The payment comes out of their pocket, by the devaluation of their stock, when the options are issued and vested. They went into it knowing they’d make a shit load of money if he pulled it off, and he’d make a shit load of money too. The stock has 25x’d since the package was created.
Edit: Just to be clear here - A better way would be through a high tax bracket that would eat the vast majority of that away forcing him to sell most of the shares (or I guess alternatively sell SpaceX shares, it’d be his choice), but keep in mind it’d be at the rate when each set vests, so it’s not a tax bill on 55b, it’s a series of tax bills on smaller amounts.
I wonder if NATO is going to try and enforce a blockade where any ship travelling through the area of cables must be escorted.
A Delaware judge recently invalidated the pay package, citing insufficient shareholder approval.
I don’t know if this is the article (its pay walled), or AI since it’s a summary, or maybe OP, but this is a terrible reporting of what happened.
The pay package was supposed to be independently created by the board, but it was found out that Elon had a heavy hand in proposing it, including the people helping him craft it. Now, I don’t think this is bad per say, but then the board was supposed to independently vet it, but the board wasn’t really deemed independent, and who they used had ties to Musk. Further, it wasn’t properly disclosed what involvement Musk had in crafting the package in the first place.
The failure to properly disclose all of this made the shareholder vote void. Had they disclosed it, and had it been approved, it would have been okay.
It had nothing to do with not having insufficient shareholder approval.
Seed phrases weren’t a thing until 2013
2013 Seed phrase words come from a standardized word list defined by Bitcoin Improvement Proposal #39 (aka BIP39). This proposal was introduced in 2013 to simplify and improve the process of backing up and recovering Bitcoin wallets.
Waiiiit, was it actually meant to be about import vs muscle, like that was it’s intention? Or did they just happen to do that.