Actually that is not true your interactions are very authentic. Beep boop.

Ooff

I’d be surprised if that’s true. Do we have any data on this or is this just “seems to make sense” stuff.

Contribute positively… By the way, this is not it.

The thing is if you want content, people feeding you it are a small minority doing most of the work.

Help them and maybe they’ll post happier stuff.

Well you have to account all the stress the poor people in power have to contend with each day. A little bonus at the end of the line is not that big of a deal. /s

Voldemort: 😢

Not a big fan oir conservative but pretty sure comparing Pollievre with Trump is laughable at best. You’re thinking of something like the PPC.

His kills are serialized.

But who will think of the shareholders!!!

As far as you know…

It depends, I worked with a statistician that worked for a major polling company and they take their job pretty seriously, a bit too much. It can be made to skew a certain way by asking questions that serves a certain conclusion but this is just vad methodology. To blanket statement the whole thing as propaganda mostly serves the propagandists. Then the common man can just bias themselves in whatever suits them best.

Technically the british parted from their own government first…

us poor folks have to eat to survive, just like the rich pricks!

Big if true

It’s just your boot sequence.

So you do think governments should enforce speech laws. I just want you to stop using this as an argument by itself.

If you look a bit on the history of fascism, they often attack liberal systems as oppressive because of laws that muzzles the hateful. Once in power, their first move is to muzzle the opposition.

Don’t be duped by their tactics, the oppressed few can barely get equal rights and the hate army is marching to take that away swaying the weak-minded with a narrative of free speech.

There is plenty of discussion to have about “the line” but we need to move away from free speech absolutists like Musk that once they get power they use it for censorship.

So you would let people yell Fire in a theatre?

There is no slippery slope if the law protects the weak from the strong.

It’s more complicated than that. Like saying there is a fire in a theatre when there is none, saying transgender are undercover perverts and a danger to society when it’s not supported by evidence will get people killed. Freedom of speech is great and all but when your lie and put people in danger there should be consequences.

The angriest upvote of them all.

You can welcome an invasion as a liberation force if no patriotism is involved. Like the eastern front did in WW2 until they realized Nazis were more about creating Lebensraum.