![](https://feddit.it/pictrs/image/c7e2ea03-1658-4789-9896-38f5d4ae5bb3.webp)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Blind people shouldn’t need to give up their privacy to Microsoft and Google to have a web page read to them.
$argon2id$v=19$m=64,t=512,p=2$UYIBCdPUJek0ndf9GUcBtA$8C2G7+xwpPBiaoybb7ZjgA
Blind people shouldn’t need to give up their privacy to Microsoft and Google to have a web page read to them.
Why are we not using them in end-user devices
Bad photographers complaining to be called out as bad photographers.
Their distribution of books is completely legal.
Corporations just have more money to warp the laws in their favour.
That’s why the Archive is appealing: they still believe they are right.
Wikipedia requires attribution, which AI scrapers never give.
It is “public” work, but under a license.
Then maybe it shouldn’t grow.
It seems a very valid reason to give up your privacy.
You could present your valid argument without calling in homophobia.
Hungary will have the presidency, not the total control. They propose discussions but the vote in the Council is still majority based.
Go vote what left parties in your country think about it. It’s likely the same.
Which features do the lack?
Doesn’t it seem that this problem is caused by Google not operating the markets in the same way?
Why would you import used devices from the US in the first place? People sell them in Europe too.
What convinces you of that?
You are right, it’s not allowed in the FIFA World Cup. I didn’t know.
If you live in Europe, .eu
You are crazy if you believe all olympics athletes are millionaires.
soccer
“Male” soccer is not restricted to men. Both genders are allowed. There are only men because they outperform women.
edit: Although FIFA forbids women from access to the main World Cup. Also the statement above is true generally, but not everywhere.
Some people care about privacy.