![](/static/253f0d9b/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/045a2049-eb61-4960-88ba-97e7f1ffbf31.jpeg)
You’re enjoying Cyberpunk, but Starfield was bland to you? Night City is sparse and empty as hell.
As an aside, the corpo storyline in Starfield is miles ahead of the corpo sroryline in Cyberpunk.
You’re enjoying Cyberpunk, but Starfield was bland to you? Night City is sparse and empty as hell.
As an aside, the corpo storyline in Starfield is miles ahead of the corpo sroryline in Cyberpunk.
They want to complain about the glasses, but all the salient points in the thread have been made, so they went with whatever.
They deorbit very quickly.
you’re the one doing each and every brushstroke, deciding each and every detail as you draw.
Does Photoshop or any digital art not count? I don’t have to have the skill to draw a perfect circle?
good photography takes skill.
So we should artificially handicap the art at the expense of the lesser abled?
Whereas for AI art, all you’re doing is providing instruction to the AI, that then goes on to make all these decisions
Same as clicking a button on a camera at something that just happens to be beautiful. Does it matter if someone next to me is using the same ISO or exposure?
I don’t have to realize the complexity of lighting, shaders, or materials to render a scene in Unreal. I get to utilize the processes that pioneers before me discovered.
I understand the frustrations, but this seems stifling in the same way that cotton-gin-phobes, typewriter-phobes, and computer-phobes wpuld have stifled the ability of the average joe to accomplish something.
To what degree do you consider AI involvement to be the deal-breaker. My phone uses something arbitrarily akin to generative AI to sharpen photos. If I take a photo with my phone of something novel, should I be able to copywrite that photo?
If I use an AI generated image and spend 24 hours manually tweaking and modifying it, do I have a right to copywrite?
If I use an LLM to synthesize an idea that I then use to organically create art, is it lesser art?
It all seems so arbitrary at this point. It’s like a typist in 2005 arguing that digital word processors shouldn’t be used to create copywritable art, as it takes significantly less work.
Another good thing Trump ruined. Relations were repairing under Obama.
Russia is actively conscripting people. The U.S. has had an entirely ‘volunteer’ force for 50 years.
You’re only saying that because he’s white a la Beck’s 1994 hit ‘Loser’ and since Beck is white that makes you racist?
No, we voted for the older guy this time.
When “Don’t let people post pictures of my son’s dick” becomes “China will disappear you if you call Winnie the Pooh a dictator as a citizen of China”.
We know about it. You’re like a Libertarian acting like they have secret knowledge when they tell you you still have to pay taxes for Universal healthcare.
Was that the show with the green wireframe CGI animals that they would show duking it out and eating wireframe people?
They aren’t. If I think you’re a bootlicking chud, I have the right to say so in America. We don’t let the offended party decide what is insulting.
They use carbrains as an insult. They expect people to add an hour to any commute.
It’s also the best hands-down. If you want to use a worse free app, that’s fine. I haven’t paid for Sync for Lemmy, and I deal with 1 ad every 5 pages or so. I’m not that sensitive.
Do you want to work for a company that will intentionally sabotage themselves? Probably not.
Then pay for the ad free version, and you’re letting them make money without ads.
If you just want to steal people’s labor, then nah.
From Wikipedia
Around the late 14th century in Europe, smaller and portable hand-held cannons were developed, creating in effect the first smooth-bore personal firearm.