How much has this to do with Michelle and Barak Obama studying at Harvard? Why is no other university involved?

He reminded the interviewer that the Chinese market is very important for its absolute size, and that it is still home to maybe 50% of the world’s AI researchers.

That’s impressive.

Amazing, Trump was right, they were trading in salt rocks.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=sP5ElraFHHE (25s)

There was an older alternative with PS and Tcl from Sun. I don’t know if I would like that more.

From where have you downloaded the script? Was it trustworthy?

It’s one vote away. Every bigger city can have one school for early birds and one for night owls. Then parents can start work whenever they want. For that, companies can have flexible starting times. If they work in shifts, allow people to trade shifts so that some do all the early and some do all the late shifts.

Without artificial light, there were no sleep problems because more than enough hours were darkness. People took breaks from sleep.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyphasic_sleep

The answer is maturity. Structure does not hurt if it is chosen voluntarily. It feels good to do things exactly as intended.

Waking up at 6:30 doesn’t hurt if sleep started early and without being drunk.

The big tragedy is that society does everything to keep as many people as possible in a state of disarray. People to whom life is as described above don’t have the will to leave bad employment situations behind.

China, India, The Americas, Australia, many parts of Africa? Life was good there.

Even Europe was not that bad. If you had many more free days, work that was meaningful and unprocessed food, how bad would it be to die earlier? In total, they still had more days of life for themselves.

How do you recognize a slave? There is no need for chains to make people work against their will.

Whoever dreads monday morning doesn’t have to be worried about slavery anymore.

Have you tried moving? The chains are already there.

So you need ChatGPT to get a helpful answer.

MS 1 : Google 0

What do you mean?

Nothing is necessary in particular, but a choice among options.

We desensitize people to compassion, we dogwhistle people into racism, we train people to ignore dishonesty, we make people comply with authority even if they are wrong, we make people believe in science instead of understanding it, and some more.

This is to make people accept their jobs and create the things that are needed.

In general, people don’t do stuff on their own. So overall the manipulation is needed if we want to have more than hunter gathering. This can be seen as malicious, but also as benevolent.

join-lemmy.org could show the posts from all, with a big join button at the top. The introduction page can be shown if somebody presses the join button.

There is one server implementation that shows it to its users. I forgot its name though.

Responsibility cannot be delegated. People are always responsible to keep themselves safe. But it makes sense for them to cooperate in a society to organize their safety.

The problem is that manipulation is part of society. For society to work, people must be unaware of some manipulations but then, manipulators can abuse the blind spots.

Overall it’s a cost benefit decision. Some abuse can be easier prevented by regulations, some by personal responsibility.

Trump announced his plans the previous day to develop the multilayered, $175 billion (€155 billion) system with ground- and space-based capabilities that can defend against a wide range of enemy weapons

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockheed_Martin_F-35_Lightning_II_development

the program was expected over its lifetime (until 2070) to cost $406.5 billion for acquisition of the jets and $1.1 trillion for operations and maintenance.

How? Hypersonic missiles should make it more difficult.

Add automation for cheap production costs and any defence system can be overwhelmed.

There is only one choice: feeling or rationality.

When you feel, you do what feels best.

When you think, you do what is the most valuable.

So no free will but that choice.

At the same time as China launches satellites with high performance processing power. What’s the deal? How can launching everything into space be cheaper than building a data center at a cold place on earth?

Last time I read something about processors in space, NASA used special processors that were hardened against radiation. If state of the art processors are too fragile for space, who would use such a data center?