At least the Military just shoots the fuckers

No, they don’t.

Probs. It also prompts you to download the app every time you open a link.

Also, wasn’t it established in lore that she couldn’t go through it because something something elder blood something?

Yes, you are. Glad you understand.

The web client is intentionally bad.

It’s an American thing.

Nobody saw downvotes and piled on, people saw a dumb comment and downvoted it. Regardless of what you decide to tell yourself.

I get convicted for rape and fraud. We have empirical evidence that it works.

Proof of what? Nintendo having a shit-ton of money? I don’t understand why you would even need a source of that, but sure, here’s one

These people should have all gotten pardons years ago

So you agree it is good.

He ubered

I really hope you’re lying because if you do know what this is about, then that just makes all of your comments worse. Also, you’re calling people who disagree with you a hivemind, so don’t try to pretend you’re fine with it.

You said that, in this case, you were in favor of a big company bullying a little one with the law because they ripped off pokemon designs, which isn’t even a topic that is being discussed here. If anyone needs a reminder of what you commented, it’s you.

Brother, you made a stupid comment. You didn’t read the article and you don’t know why the lawsuit is happening. Literally all of your comments are irrelevant to the discussion — you can’t hide behind it’s the hivemind!

Wait, you can refund your kid?!

If the recording equipment came with a subscription to a cloud storage provider that automatically uploaded everything you record on it by default and they did not report it to the authorities. Yes, we should.

I didn’t imply that. You did by leaving an overly hostile response to a comment about an article you didn’t read with objections that were addressed before you left your comment.

Nah, mate. Wanna take a guess at what actually does stand out as rather asinine and contributing nothing to the point?

So you took one sentence out of context and used it to dismiss the rest of the comment with objections that had already been addressed by the parts you dismissed?

Sounds like you’re having a bad day. I even gave you a quote from the article that answers your exact question. Everything okay at home?

The school would still have to be the one buying the books so they just won’t buy any book they deem inappropriate. I’m sure this is mainly just to stop zealots from banning everything related to evolution. Also, I haven’t read Naked Lunch but from what I know of it, I doubt it has anything kids can’t get on the Internet nowadays.

From the article:

The bill permits restriction in the case of “developmentally inappropriate material” for certain age groups. The measure also requires local school boards and the governing bodies of public libraries to set up policies for book curation and the removal of library materials, including a way to address concerns over certain items.