• 1 Post
  • 735 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle





  • Years ago, I played with AWS then contacted their support to make sure any AWS billing to my account was disabled.
    I thought I’d try it again recently, and couldn’t log in.
    I still don’t think I’m missing anything.

    I’d rather have VPS or server providers where I know exactly what I’m getting per month no matter what, tho I’ve ran near data transfer surcharges.


  • Oh, it’s expected costs.
    Like, figure out the compute requirements of your code, multiply by the cost per compute unit (or whatever): boom, your cost.
    Totally predictable.
    Compared to suddenly having to replace a $20k server that dies in your data center.
    So much easier.

    Except when your code (let’s be honest, the most likely thing to have an error in it… At least compared to some 4+ year old production hardware that everyone runs) has a bug in it that requires 20x compute.
    But maybe that is a popularity spike (the hug-of-death)! That’s why you migrated to the #cloud anyway, right? To handle these spikes! And you’ve always paid your bills so… Yeh, here’s a 20x bill.


  • The amount of software that is limited free self-hosted but the next tier of “self hosted” is enterprise and thousands per year is ridiculous.
    Absolutely ridiculous.

    Like, you have self hosted. I like your software, I use it personally and that’s why I’m using it for (and recommending it to) small businesses. They could afford your 10-100 per month for whatever extra features, but they don’t want to rely on 3rd party hosting. They want to host it themselves.
    But the only way to get those features is to go for some “cloud” bullshit they don’t control, or to pay “enterprise” prices.

    It’s why I make part of what I make/charge a contribution to the products and projects I use and recommend.
    I’ll set all that up and tailor it to your company, but anything and everything I recommend/implement is standing on the shoulders of giants. So pay those giants.
    Although I think I’m lucky with the people I work for, in that that are interested in the tech, but not the detail.




  • Autopilot crashes?
    You mean MCAS (Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System)?
    It’s not autopilot. It’s worse than that.

    Due to the larger engines needing to be mounted in a different place, the flight characteristics changed between previous gen 737s and the new 737 MAX.

    The characteristic change would mean it needs different certification from air authorities and existing 737 pilots would require recertification to be able to fly the new 737 MAX (which is supposed to be just an updated model).
    All very expensive for what should be merely an upgraded model.

    To avoid this, Boeing used software to change the characteristics in order to bring it inline with previous 737s and the existing certifications.
    And as it was just an augmentation system, it was deemed high risk but not critical risk. As such, it didn’t require full redundancy, didn’t require Quick Reference Handbook entries incase of issues/errors, and didn’t require training.
    In fact, pilots had no idea it existed, what it could do or how it worked.

    Which means when it had an issue and caused extreme pitch down due to faulty sensor readings, the pilots had literally no idea what was happening as they were trying to stop the plane from accumulating pitch down every 5 seconds.

    And then Boeing tried to fuck with the narrative. I think they also didn’t tell pilots about MCAS until after the Ethiopian Airlines crash (the 2nd caused by MCAS), but I’m not 100% sure on the timeline.

    Boeing has had a stream of QA issues, the way MCAS was handled was idiotic, they are a shitty company.

    But I have no issues flying in a Boeing.
    I don’t like or trust the company, but I trust the air authorities. And most of all, I trust the pilots.



  • “The United States has unilaterally and repeatedly provoked new economic and trade frictions, exacerbating uncertainty and instability in bilateral economic and trade relations,” the statement said. “Instead of reflecting on its own actions, the United States has groundlessly accused China of violating the consensus, a claim that grossly distorts the facts.”

    That is such a wonderfully diplomatic way of saying “stop being a fucking idiot, your words have meaning and these are the consequences. Grow up”.
    Even just “grow up”, tbh.

    As much as I dislike the amount of reliance the world has on China (for the labour conditions there, the nature of their government to impose dodgy practices, generally speaking not being a “good egg”), China seems like the only trading bloc (although not a bloc, I guess… Maybe “trading entity”) that can unilaterally stand toe-to-toe with TACO and win. So, good on china.




  • Yup.
    It’s a traumatic job/task that gets farmed to the cheapest supplier which is extremely unlikely to have suitable safe guards and care for their employees.

    If I were implementing this, I would use a safer/stricter model with a human backed appeal system.
    I would then use some metrics to generate an account reputation (verified ID, interaction with friends network, previous posts/moderation/appeals), and use that to either: auto-approve AI actions with no appeals (low rep); auto-approve AI actions with human appeal (moderate rep); AI actions must be approved by humans (high rep).

    This way, high reputation accounts can still discuss & raise awareness of potentially moderatable topics as quickly as they happen (think breaking news kinda thing). Moderate reputation accounts can argue their case (in case of false positives). Low reputation accounts don’t traumatize the moderators.