If you are male, then this video could clarify a bit: https://youtu.be/x3lypVnJ0HM Main point is that twice as many guys want a relationship comparing to gals, so you should really stand out in a quirky way to get noticed

it’s so unethical they mention the arrested person’s name. They are not even proven guilty yet

Agreed

I would not. Why? It won’t fix anything. People would just switch to TikTok or Telegram or something, which is not that much better

Trump only respects strength, so at first no favours, no deals, protect national interests as fiercely as possible no matter the cost.

After enough strength posturing, I think it would be possible to negotiate with Trump and do business without selling off my country completely.

Then just pray we survive until 2029 or Trump dies

Can’t an instance also collect IP-addreses and device info, if its owner adds some scripts to its web version?

Did you get anyone to switch from Discord and Hangouts to Signal and SimpleX? How?

Probably UX designers decided that’s too difficult and confusing for most users

Lack of content and lack of recommended page to find content

I really don’t understand people in the comments here. I agree it’s his son’s decision to date whoever they want. However it’s also dad’s right to not push feelings down his throat and spend time with people he does not like.

Why not say “hey son, I respect your romantic choices, but I am not ready to spend time with King yet. i will let you know when this changes”?

I think Startpage had some feature like “Anonymous Web Page View”

Do I understand correctly, what you mean is that there is an Invidious instance to which two users are connected. User A sends request to Invidious to get a video, Invidious forwards it to user B, user B downloads the video and sends it back to user A?

Sounds a lot like Tor or maybe I am missing something?

Sounds cool asf, probably the way private messaging apps should be

Although, it is not really fitting my threat model, I would love to see how it develops

You recognize patterns by observing long-term trends, not by overreacting to whatever most outrageous news headline you see right now

Who are you referring to as “the whole world”, specifically? People on Lemmy? Leftists? Your friends IRL?

His salute does not affect your life in any meaningful way unless you let it do so.

If we ban centralization then IRC, Signal, Xenforo, vBulletin

Signal is not social media, IRC is an open protocol, isn’t it? I do not know about the rest.

Even when you have federation, each unit in that “web” will usually have a centralized moderation team and administration.

I do not have a problem with that. The problem with centralized social media is that users are locked in to using some specific app because all their friends are there, which makes it harder to switch. This gives monopolies like Facebook an unfair advantage.

Can you suggest a comparable alternative?

I dunno, how Lemmy does this?

Do you mean that they at most should be non-profit? And if so, why?

Yes I mean that. For-profit social media profits from increasing user engagement, even if that means through getting people addicted, intentionally not dealing with misinformation (because misinformation is usually more outrageous and gets people more engaged), data collection and other unethical practices, all because shareholders need the line to go up.

I support blocking commercial, proprietary and centralized social media everywhere.

Stop switching to every new “cool” and “encrypted” service every time the previous one disappointed you a little bit. This is not helpful neither for your time, nor for privacy community overall. We should lean on most developed and best platforms we have right now (Proton, Signal etc.) and get everyone to switch. Unless we know we have market dominance, dispersing our efforts is futile.

And yep, answering your question, Tuta Mail is fine

deleted by creator