Ads are a core component of how search makes money. They’re also a core component of how YouTube makes money.
Ads are a core component of how search makes money. They’re also a core component of how YouTube makes money.
It’s also just often completely inaccurate. The standards it uses to cite works make them pretty much useless: any good information on Wikipedia is on there by accident.
Saudi Arabia doesn’t have the power to dick around with human rights halfway across the globe.
I too enjoy reading Western media instead of experiencing things first-hand.
You do realize that Tibetan independence was never recognized by any country, right? Not even the British.
Do you understand Tibetan history up to that point? At least it’s no longer a serfdom system (which Tibetan advocates will say was equal because of the one-in-a-million chance that one of the peasants can become the Dalai Lama and that everyone was totally happy because everyone was working towards bettering Buddhism). How many Tibetan refugees do you know who experienced serfdom?
Satellites have some degree of mobility and space junk follows trajectories that can be computed basically infinitely into the future.
Space junk is highly deterministic, though. No atmosphere to fuck with.
Why would Ford care when it can just petition the US government to block the sale of Chinese cars? It’s the same thing Boeing did to block Bombardier sales in the US.
It absolutely is, even if your particular instance hasn’t been. Lemmy.world probably takes the brunt of it.
Does that claim remove the existence of conflict of interest?
If you feel like giving China a domestic supply of O&G so they can switch their coal plants to gas ones, be my guest.
That’s been the single greatest contributor to reduced emissions in North America and Europe over the past few decades.
State funding describes a conflict of interest, whether perceived or actual.
Musk wasn’t wrong in applying the state media tag to NPR/BBC/CBC. At the end of the day, they are funded by the state.
Thanks, China.
The entire point of E2EE is that it doesn’t matter who the host is.
Tell me you haven’t read the Communist Manifesto without telling me you haven’t read the Communist Manifesto.
China is moving faster on renewables than every other country. China is moving faster on EVs than every other country.
Who’s not changing?
Then why have a peace blueprint in the first place? By your description, Ukraine has no reason whatsoever to ask for peace. Why propose a peace blueprint?
Have you looked at what’s considered a valid “source” on Wikipedia?
The fact that there’s an odd good article does not make the site a reliable source of anything.