• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      What is your specific issue with this policy?

      I get that you think it is being done as a political stunt, but what is the actual issue you have with it aside from that?

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Its a handout to condom companies and stores that otherwise would have to compete on price. Granted, I don’t know how it would be implemented, but these tend not to be implemented well

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          So it’s better to make people pay for their own condoms and other OTC contraceptives rather than have insurance cover it? Because that sounds worse to me.

          • aidan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yes, insurance exists for unexpected events, that’s why its insurance. A condom is a cost you willingly accept. And to be honest, primary care often shouldn’t be insurable, but since plans are required to cover it without price discrimination it kills direct primary care- so this is something that has to be accepted. Now, if medicare/medicaid and other programs choose to cover it that’s a different thing, but requiring all plans cover it is dumb. But I guess plans don’t really have to compete that much on price and value-added that much anymore post-ACA anyways

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Then insurance should also not cover things like breast exams and colonoscopies, right?

              They are not unexpected events.

              • aidan@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                As I said in theory insurance shouldn’t cover primary care, but this is required post-ACA, and I think before too but I’m not sure starting from when. I think direct primary care could be great(but there are also otherways to do it, like optional primary care insurance).

                For some preventative things insurance would choose to cover it if it weren’t required to save them money in the long run.

                  • aidan@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    I did answer, I think that should be negotiated between the insurer and insuree, and should not be required to be covered.

    • ProIsh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Damn those dems using common sense policies to win votes!!

      I want my representatives to use fear mongering and do absolutely nothing!

    • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      92
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Let me fix that for you: a politician’s attempt to court disengaged voters by presenting a popular proposal. AKA democracy.

          • solrize@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            41
            ·
            1 day ago

            They’ve been in office for 4 years and they finally think about the voters. What reaction do you expect?

            • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              23 hours ago

              they finally think about the voters.

              Okay so apparently you’ve been burying your head in the sand because it’s been nothing but progress in the past four years. From college forgiveness, to decriminalization, drop in violent crime, expanding overtime…

              But nah it’s cool bro THANKS BRANDON or whatever y’all say

              • catloaf@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                8
                ·
                22 hours ago

                I wouldn’t say “nothing but progress”. There was that railroad union busting thing. And the student loan thing (though that was the Republicans’ fault). And currently there’s the whole genocide thing.

            • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              18 hours ago

              So do they just have to stop governing at some point in order to receive your blessing. Exactly how many weeks/months out should they stop governing?

            • Funderpants @lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              22
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 day ago

              Perhaps the voting public to have a bit more reflection than you seem to. It’s not like this is the one thing they’ve done in four years.

              • solrize@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                23
                ·
                edit-2
                23 hours ago

                Harris is in serious danger of losing to Trump. It takes a special kind of terrible candidate to be able to do that. Only Hillary Clinton accomplished it in the past. If Trump gets re-elected though, maybe the Dems can try for a new world record by launching three failed impeachments next term instead of two.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Who exactly should they have run, and did you canvass for that person?

                  Remember, that person also has to want to run.

    • TriflingToad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      23 hours ago

      that’s the hardest ratio on this site I’ve SEEN. The only upvote from one hundred and six people was from yourself.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        I’ve got plus around 500 and minus around 500 on Reddit once EDIT: in the same day. Don’t remember which was which. The upvoted comment was vague approval of USSR’s actually existent checks and balances. I suspect the other one was generally the same at the same subreddit. I suspect when Redditors see something vague, they just guess, and then the next Redditor only looks at the vote count.

    • Capt. Wolf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The White House: *does anything*

      Idiots: DERE JEST DOING IT FUR VOTES!!!

      Also idiots: DA DUMOCRATES HAVUNT DUN ENYTHING DURRING DERE TURM!!!1!!

      Shhhhhh… The adults are working…

      Go finish your beer.

    • calabast@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 day ago

      I don’t really think of proposing new policies as “desperate” so much as just trying to outline her goals to people who are still undecided.

      Now if she went out and did some weird photoshoot stunt, I might start to pull out the desperate label.

    • rand_alpha19@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      A desperate attempt by Kamala to limit the number of women dying from pregnancy complications since they have little to no access to abortion?