• Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Very rational take. You learn entering the world that every company has a dark side, and every person has a line, but that line shifts.

    Personally I’d avoid Lockheed, but when it comes to paying the mortgage, the bank is surprisingly not very amenable to me not having a job. I’d love to avoid working at any bad company, but I’d probably have to sell my house and live out of a studio, and my family would suffer for it.

    So I give some graces. For example, people shame folks who work at amazon, but Amazon pays the bills. What I personally have changed to is judging people for being gung ho about a company, happy with what the company is doing, or are they just there as a job. If you’re in accounting and you just loooove working for Amazon and think they do no wrong, then yes I judge a lot

    • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Thank you for this incredibly rational take.

      What I personally have changed to is judging people for being gung ho about a company, happy with what the company is doing, or are they just there as a job. If you’re in accounting and you just loooove working for Amazon and think they do no wrong, then yes I judge a lot

      This. I’ll usually get along fine with my fellow working class folks in the trenches wherever I end up, and I’ll make friends with the cool managers even if they’re managers.

      Few people are excited to be forced into a corrupt and awful system to justify their existence.

      But more often than not, they’re the True Believers™ that are so utterly brain-warped into thinking some job actually cares about them, and make it part of their identity to “represent the brand”. I give these simps a wiiiide berth.

      When it’s a grunt employee with that mindset, it’s even more pathetic.